Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Why include transistors?
resistion   7/8/2014 6:40:01 PM
NO RATINGS
The sign of applied compliance is the abrupt current jump in SET discontinuous with dI/dV afterward

EE_engineer
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Why include transistors?
EE_engineer   7/8/2014 1:33:57 PM
NO RATINGS
to resistion -  it seems that they are using a passive crosspoint structure ("transistor-less" crossbar array) considering the core memory circuit pic shown above.

I guess they are refering to mux/demux transistors outside of the passive crosspoint memory structure (a circuit designer's point of view).

 

EE_engineer
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Why include transistors?
EE_engineer   7/8/2014 1:26:58 PM
NO RATINGS
to resistion - I am not sure about that. Looks like current still increases as voltage increases after the programming. And the device seems to be programmed w/o external current compliance, which is good.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: HSR too close to cliff
resistion   7/4/2014 7:23:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Their selector is or closely resembles the threshold switching device like the ovonic type.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Why include transistors?
resistion   7/2/2014 7:53:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Ah, I see the I-V indicates no self-compliance. That makes it transistor-bound. It's a waste of the built-in HSR.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Why include transistors?
resistion   7/2/2014 12:41:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I had thought Crossbar utilized transistor-less "crossbar" arrays. Adding the transistor only worsens the density, compared to without.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
HSR too close to cliff
resistion   7/2/2014 12:31:02 AM
NO RATINGS
That HSR definition looks too close to the cliff!



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
17 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).