Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Easing the costs of identifying and obtaining conflict-free materials
DrQuine   7/5/2014 12:52:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps the cost of identifying and obtaining conflict-free materials could be eased through partnerships. A few companies are already leaders in compliance. If other companies partner with them for certification and procurement of these resources, the compliance costs can be shared and the need to "reinvent the wheel" is eliminated. There are enough companies in this effort already that we don't need to worry about a monopoly developing - and the new conflict-free materials supply-line might make a nice side business. There would also be economies of scale with larger purchase volumes being purchased.

Fern Abrams
User Rank
Rookie
Dodd-Frank Does Not Prevent the Use of Conflict Minerals
Fern Abrams   7/2/2014 1:29:42 PM
NO RATINGS
There are several problems with the author's statement:

"For the moment, and because earlier this year the Appellate Court struck down part of the rule, section 1502 in the wide-ranging Dodd-Frank legislation does not force companies to cease the use of these conflict minerals"

For starters, as all tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold are defined by Dodd-Frank to be conflict minerals, regardless of origin, Dodd-Frank does not, nor will it, "force companies to cese the use of these conflict minerals."  It would be quite an engineering feet to manufacture electronics without tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold.

Second, assuming the author meant to refer to conflict minerals associated with conflict mines, the act does not forbid the use of these either as that was determined to be a likely WTO violation.   Dodd-Frank, intended as a "name and shame," provision, requires only that companies report on the sourcing of their minerals with the hope that they will be shamed into avoiding doing business with conflict mines and others promoting violence.

Jessica Lipsky
User Rank
Author
The aftermath
Jessica Lipsky   7/2/2014 11:16:59 AM
NO RATINGS
One thing that wasn't clearly outlined in the reporting process (in the US) was reprecussions for not filing. Is that why figures were so low in this first year of required reporting?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
11 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).