Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
EmbeddedSteve718
User Rank
Rookie
Nothing really new. . .
EmbeddedSteve718   7/8/2014 10:42:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Just an updated variation of a theme:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_on_a_chip

3 companies listed here:  They've been around for years. . . .

ARM's Latest:  http://www.arm.com/products/system-ip/interconnect/corelink-ccn-508.php

IBM's been doing this for years:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Gene

Anyone know of Tilera (http://www.tilera.com) recently purchased by EZChip?  Another multi-core MIT spin-off.

HW is good, but being able to exploit this "correctly" requires rather smart Software that doesn't exist.  Tilera and other multi-core folks have been playing with this for years, still not there. . .  Even today, with ARM interconnects, SW can only do so much to exploit the HW.  Until HW and SW get together (i.e. make a hole in the fence) - we'll never fully utilize all the CPU power we have.  We'll just continue to waste it with more cores running crappy software. . . . 

As the Saying Goes:  "It's the software, stuipd". . . .

R_Colin_Johnson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Nothing really new. . .
R_Colin_Johnson   7/8/2014 11:14:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Your'e right if they fail, but just like the other guys , these guys think they have the software right this time. If they do have siomething new and validate their software through testing, then they will release the Verilog hardware description, so at least they are doing things in the right order!

markhahn0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Nothing really new. . .
markhahn0   7/13/2014 2:07:53 AM
NO RATINGS
It's funny that people always whinge about how software is the problem, that sw isn't taking advantage of the hw.  I'd like to propose the opposite: very little sw needs highly parallel hw.  As a person who works with highly parallel systems every day, I always cringe when someone asks why their desktop system doesn't run 4x faster on a 4-core system.  The answer is mainly "because you don't need it to".  Or a little less sarcastically: you have tiny sections of workload that may be inherently parallel enought to take advantage of highly parallel hardware, but most of your time is spent waiting on the user, or IO or memory.

There are plenty of workloads that can effectively utilize a 36-core chip today, AND DO SO.  Heck, 36c isn't even a bit system these days - it's doable in a simple commodity dual-socket server.  Not to mention Phi or GPUs.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
10 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).