Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Software patents are silly after all...
betajet   7/19/2014 4:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Navelpluis wrote: What I really really don't understand is why copyright is protected for such a long time.

The answer is pretty simple: if Mickey Mouse and Superman become public domain, anyone can use them as characters as shown in this brilliant Tom the Dancing Bug cartoon by Ruben Bolling.  He also created this wonderful cartoon, in which the League of Public Domain Properties tries to rescue a victim from the chains of death-plus-70-years (for now) copyright.

Navelpluis
User Rank
CEO
Software patents are silly after all...
Navelpluis   7/19/2014 3:09:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Please do not forget that software patents will mainly kill the smaller companies. They simply don't have the power to protect their IP. Apart from this you have to consider that software pantents certainly will delay engineering processing and innovation. Hardware patents is another ballgame. You need to protect your physical IP, otherwise others will copy it. The same problem arises about the protection, but with hardware -at least- you can find people that understand your issues and are able to help you to protect your IP. (no cure no pay, etc)

What I really really don't understand is why copyright is protected for such a long time. Even after 70 years the family of the former owner can claim. Compare this with the 12 years of hardware patent duration. I think that it would be a good idea if all go back to at most 10 years. And no software patents because of the sillyness of it, seen a few, I laughed my pants off... what a b*llsh*t....

SteveRubin
User Rank
Blogger
What is "abstract"?
SteveRubin   7/18/2014 6:16:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Susan, I think your concern identifies the problem.  I don't think anyone, even the Supreme Court, knows what "abstract" means. Further, even if we did know what "abstract" is, at what level of abstraction should we be looking?  

przem
User Rank
Manager
Re: Abstract is too abstract
przem   7/18/2014 4:59:21 PM
NO RATINGS
There's this old parlor game where you add 'in bed' to advice from fortune cookies ("look for new opportunities"), and everyone has a good laugh. I found it only briefly amusing. It seems to me that the SCOTUS is essentially saying that just adding a similar qualifier  ("on a computer") is not sufficient to make an idea novel or patentable.

betajet
User Rank
CEO
Re: Abstract is too abstract
betajet   7/11/2014 3:48:45 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think anyone understands what SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) means by "abstract", including SCOTUS.  From what I can tell, it's like Justice Potter Stewart's famous quote about obscenity: "I know it when I see it" [Wikipedia].

It remains to be seen if lower courts start tossing out software patents on the basis of "too abstract".  My guess is that more cases will be appealed to SCOTUS and the "software patent tax" on technology products will keep rising.  When SCOTUS gets tired of hearing yet another abstract patent case, then they'll come up with a reasonable test.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Blogger
Abstract is too abstract
Susan Rambo   7/11/2014 2:01:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I still don't get the abstract concept in patents. Does anyone else have trouble with this?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).