Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 5
User Rank
ericha2   7/21/2014 2:26:32 PM
I personally like ROI better for comparing individual project, as the ratio lets you combine multiple projects for better return.  Given the scenario of N projects of which you don't have funding for all of them, however, I think NPV of sets of projects--each of which maxes out the funding available (each of which has a positive NPV)--is the best comparison.  I wouldn't try all possible combinations; I'd start with the ones that have the highest ROI and come up with several possible groupings that uses up the available funding, then pick the one with the highest NPV.

This assumes, of course, that each project is risk-free.  That is rarely the case.  As part of this exercise I'd try to make some reasonable guesses about how risky each project is.  Is this something the team has done before (not very risky)?  Is it new to the team (pretty risky)?  Is it new to the world (very risky)?  What's the likelyhood that a competitor will emerge that drops your sales--do you have strong barriers to entry (such as patents, regulations, customer relationships, or proprietary technology or distribution channel  that's hard to duplicate), or is this an area that a strong competitor would naturally want to enter?  What's the likelyhood that there is a supplier gets too much control and sucks up all the profit (think Intel and Microsoft for PCs).  Discounting ROI & NPV for risk is not an easy task--there is no simple formula you can use.  But to not include this as part of the analysis neglects what happens in the real world!

I also personally like the idea of doing some portfolio-style analysis on projects--some portion are low risk with low return, and some portion are higher risk with higher return.  If the high-return projects pay off, that's great.  If not, you've still got the low-risk projects to keep you going.

User Rank
Re: Engineering and Economics
Measurement.Blues   7/21/2014 12:25:56 PM
I'd like to amend GarySXT's statement to say:

Financially successful engineering is as much about good economics and good marketing as it is good technology.

I argue that you can have good engineering without financial success. remember Beta video tape?

User Rank
Sanjib.A   7/21/2014 12:17:42 PM
Exactly!! I tried doing MBA part-time while doing job but found finance a boring subject. Mathematical problems finance were interesting to solve but I found accounting horribly confusing...the balance sheet...oh!! I had to give-up for other reasons, but I was happy that I got rid of that...after all I like to spend time with electronics during that extra time became available...

But I agree that to be a good engineering manager or an entrepreneur, once should have good understanding of finance.

Larry Desjardin
User Rank
Re: Engineering and Economics
Larry Desjardin   7/21/2014 11:40:45 AM
Well said.  It is at the nexus of technology, markets, and economics.

User Rank
Engineering and Economics
GarySXT   7/21/2014 11:38:16 AM
Good engineering is as much about good economics as it is good technology.


User Rank
antedeluvian   7/21/2014 9:35:34 AM

I actually though it would be a good idea to get an MBA part time.

When I finsihed my engineering degree, since I finished so far back in the pack, I decided that I wouldn't be a good engineer. I then did an MBA. It seemed to me an engineer as a manager was a good plan since a) you could get further organizationally and b) there were always managers who needed to understand what the engineers were doing.

Circumstances conspired and got me into engineering rather than management, and I have only recently moved part-time into management.

User Rank
MeasurementBlues   7/21/2014 8:55:48 AM
I actually thought it would be a good idea to get an MBA part time. My best classes were economics and the worst were accounting and business law. Coming from an engineering background, I found the whole cencept of law illogical.

The required finance class was easy, but boring.

So I ended up taking a job as an editor.

<<   <   Page 5 / 5 Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Power can be a gating factor in success or failure of ...
Get to market faster and connect your next product to the ...
See how microQSFP is setting a new standard for tomorrow’s ...
The LTC3649 step-down regulator combines key features of a ...
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...