Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
a.sun
User Rank
Rookie
Re: energy and competing architectures
a.sun   8/8/2014 1:11:25 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess one can hardly find compatibility between Google's and Facebook networking platform at least in hardwares. Google's system relies heavily on 40GbE (4x10G) in various forms while I can hardly see 40GbE mentioned in those Facebook's OCP documents. In terms of hardware investment, it seems Facebook is more conservative and inclined to choose the least expensive solutions to scale out. Google, on the other hand, lead the use of advanced interconnect technologies in their mega datacenters. It'll be no suprise to see Google becomes to first one to try 100GbE (4x25G) or the recent 25GbE inside their datacenters while most others start to transition from 1GbE to 10GbE, most likely because of 10Gbase-T is getting cheap. 

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
Re: energy and competing architectures
docdivakar   7/31/2014 12:50:11 PM
NO RATINGS
@Rick: regarding whether Google and Facebook networking platfroms will be compatible, it all depends on standards for SDN; there are none today! We all know some are more 'open' than others so it will be interesting how the two companies' approaches will enable interoperability in the datacenter!

Given this, I found one of the Infonetics survey finding surprising -87% think SDN will be in production by 2016! The link below has more info:

http://bit.ly/1n7j1IY

MP Divakar

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Manager
silicon photonics
wilber_xbox   7/29/2014 2:44:44 PM
NO RATINGS
This area is going to build strenghts due to the growing need of the datacenters. Lots of research ongoing to integrate the photonics onto the silicon chip.

Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re: energy and competing architectures
Anand.Yaligar   7/27/2014 4:04:57 AM
NO RATINGS
@markwrob: In the end they are building to serve the customers, and I?d like to see the beta testing of such architectures and how the common crowd adapts to the architecture faster. The faster you habituate yourself to any of the architectures, the more are you going to use it, and this will dictate market holdings of both the companies.

Anand.Yaligar
User Rank
Rookie
Re: energy and competing architectures
Anand.Yaligar   7/27/2014 4:02:09 AM
NO RATINGS
@Kinnar: Well if there are common standards these giants will be developing by, then one can expect to see both of these companies working in unison under a common architecture than supports both architectures. We just have to wait and see.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
Re: energy and competing architectures
elctrnx_lyf   7/25/2014 4:21:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Is there any requirement for the data centre design of different companies need the compatibility when it is one of their secret sauce to provide the light speed access to the user.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: energy and competing architectures
rick merritt   7/25/2014 12:44:22 PM
NO RATINGS
@Kinnar: I think its TBD whether Google and Facebook networking platfroms will be compatible.

Interestingly, Google is helping drive Openflow but Facebook is driving networking through its Open Compute Project.

Kinnar
User Rank
CEO
Re: energy and competing architectures
Kinnar   7/25/2014 6:57:40 AM
NO RATINGS
You are right, if the Giants like Google, Facebook are designing and developing their own systems, there can hardly any chance of being compatible to each other. It will be proprietary and will remain proprietary.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: energy and competing architectures
Sheetal.Pandey   7/25/2014 2:48:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Its good for the industry that two giant users of web Google and Facebook are sharing their thoughts. It will benefit everytone. But both of them must have different needs how to use web content. Quanity of data must be comparable but privacy sectors are different.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
Re: energy and competing architectures
krisi   7/24/2014 7:23:35 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you @markwrob for the explanation...somewhat puzzling strategy though...I thought the whole point of SDN was to be open and common to all datacenters by removing Cisco proprietary stuff...so the cost can come down significantly...but it seems we are replacing Cisco, Junniper, Huwaei with Google, FB and Alibaba...the more things change the more they stay the same

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).