Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Gondalf
User Rank
Freelancer
Samsung is Korean anymore??
Gondalf   7/26/2014 9:01:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Ahem, 28nm Samsung process is without FinFets :)

Looking at the main Samsung's shareholders i had a surprise, nearly all the larger investors in this firm are USA founds and banks. In this condition obviously Samsung has to show gratitude and acknowledge that in the future a lot of jobs and much research will be based in Usa. IMO Austin will become the main hub for foundry and many of the disputes with Apple will be resolved for political reasons.

In a popular Korean foum i have read a comment: "but.... Samsung is Korean???"

Very smart question indeed !!

Charles.Desassure
User Rank
Manager
Smart Move...
Charles.Desassure   7/26/2014 8:15:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, it looks like Samsung has learned how to play the game.  I think this is a great move.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
14 nm
resistion   7/27/2014 2:09:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung allegedly has the 14 nm Apple and Qualcomm order, Morris conceded recently. That makes them the real 14 nm winner.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 14 nm
rick merritt   7/27/2014 2:39:21 AM
NO RATINGS
@Resistion: Do you have a url for Morris [Chang?] commenting on Apple?

 

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Samsung is Korean anymore??
rick merritt   7/27/2014 2:42:56 AM
NO RATINGS
@Gondalf: Thanks for catching my boneheaded "FinFET" mistake...I know better! Fixed.

Gondalf
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: 14 nm
Gondalf   7/28/2014 5:04:48 AM
NO RATINGS
Ummmm, Chang said something about orders on 16nm in 2015. Still he does not say that Apple or Qualcomm have cancelled ALL 16nm orders on TSMC, moreover he say that TSMC will be a lot better in 2016 and 2017 on this node; in short words in 2015 Chang will give to customers all the capacity TSMC have decided to dedicate to 16nm for economic reasons.

Now, i think nobody knows the real story. I have the suspect about a mid 2015 nearly risk production at Samsung just to satisfy Apple and my bet is in an Apple multi-foundry approach in 2016. About Qualcomm, it will be on TSMC 20nm in 2015 so i think that TSMC will not lose much on 16nm node with this firm. Another variable is that Samsung has not enough wafer capacity so again i can't see many problems for TSMC, it is growing in revenue so well doing the devices on the more yielding process availabe at the moment, without doing strange push in hardcore spaces. 

But the story has another downside.

I don't see winners here. The real winner is the foundry capable to deliver devices on a node at the higher gross margin. Samsung want to rush?? ok! still i can't see much net profit here but only an useless red flag to make expensive competition to the MUCH bigger TSMC foundry asset. I fully agreed this is an attempt to have a stronger relevance in foundry world but without a multiyears experience in FinFet lithographic design, all this could end in a sad story.

This is the reason Intel has delayed 14nm. Broadwell was ready in Q1/2014, Intel was capable to manufacture it at the beginning of this year. Still a 60/70% yield level does not fit with Intel business model......so better wait another year, the very low power 22nm FinFet process is good enough in a world in which ALL foundries have huge delay and 28/20nm will are the bulk of the volume production for others two years from now.

 

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 14 nm
resistion   7/28/2014 6:16:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, it's likely Apple driving 14 nm volume demand next year. A little early for Qualcomm to go to 14 nm, but Samsung gets early benefit.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
Re: 14 nm
docdivakar   7/30/2014 8:54:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember discussions on SemiWiki a year or two ago on 28nm yields at TSMC and there was even a guessing contest! I may be wrong on this but I think TSMC did not officially disclose their yields for 28nm nodes (or did so at a much later date).

In the absence of published data, I have seen horrible yield numbers speculated for 20nm nodes (10% to 30%) so one would think this will not get any better at 14nm. So it seems to me that the buzz on 14nm nodes is more a headline-garnering topic than a viable business one!

MP Divakar

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: 14 nm
resistion   7/31/2014 1:28:17 AM
NO RATINGS
All that was mentioned was next year a dip in 16 nm orders due to a competitor (offering 14 nm) grabbing the big share.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Vetinari Clock: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions …
Max Maxfield
24 comments
Things are bouncing merrily along with regard to my uber-cool Vetinari Clock project. The wooden cabinet is being handcrafted by my chum Bob (a master carpenter) using an amazing ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...