Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
Re: Resist-less is not realistic
elctrnx_lyf   8/6/2014 6:26:58 AM
NO RATINGS
The companies in semiconductor industry are trying to push the boundaries of the nature to get the latest technologies for high end IC manufactuirng. IBM definitely wants to keep their place without a question.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
Re: Kudos to the analyst
goafrit   8/6/2014 5:27:48 AM
NO RATINGS
>> Congratulations to the analyst for a substantive, technical, "truth to power" analysis.  It may be the first I've ever seen

Very good work indeed. The validation is actually on the comments and interests the work has generated. Great work by EETimes to make this always-hard insight available.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Resist-less is not realistic
resistion   8/5/2014 2:47:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Some cooling time would have to be included and we also need to consider the optics, which would heat up even more. There is no ambient.

TanjB
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Resist-less is not realistic
TanjB   8/5/2014 11:49:36 AM
NO RATINGS
That is only about 3 joules per wafer, assuming 9illuminated features are 25% of the surface area.  On a 100 micron wafer the wafer is going to expand about 1 part per million.  However, the chuck may be 100 times more massive, made of a low expansion material, and probably on a temperature controlled mount.  It seems like this aspect could be routinely controlled?  The wafer would need to be at a repeatable, predictable temperature within 0.02 C accuracy to hold expansion across a 2cm field to 1nm - any design for high accuracy lithography, regardless of energy source, must aim for that level of control.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Resist-less is not realistic
resistion   8/4/2014 4:25:09 PM
NO RATINGS
After enough EUV-heated wafers (heating from absorption), the wafer chuck being warmer expands some ppm, which matters over 300 mm. In fact, applies even without resist, but resist patterning involves overlay.

docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
SemiWiki Link on This Topic
docdivakar   8/4/2014 3:18:29 PM
NO RATINGS
EE Times readers may be interested in this posting on SemiWiki by Mr. Robert Maire:

http://www.semiwiki.com/forum/f2/asml-ibm-grossly-misleading-about-euv-progress-4506.html

MP Divakar

milesgehm
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Resist-less is not realistic
milesgehm   8/4/2014 1:36:02 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
I have never worked anywhere close to this node.  I can kind of imagine why cleaning might be needed, but stopping to cool if resist is used sounds improbable.  Why would that be the case?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: Follow up
resistion   8/3/2014 8:30:20 PM
NO RATINGS
@TanjB, the exposure latitude is for 10%CD off target at best focus (by most references). Of course there is also a focus window, which normally accounts for another 10%. When not at best focus, the exposure latitude can go down significantly; some of the graphs already show that. Some features like lines or arrays can have enhanced exposure latitude with some type of off-axis illumination, but for random metal or poly layouts, there is always going to be some trouble spot with much reduced exposure latitude or depth of focus.

You're right about the trade-off of multiple steps with overlay, so there has been some move toward more self-aligned patterning, but this actually restricts the layout quite a bit.

So there are still many patterning options being studied, but I think a greater concern is the demand for smaller geometries, in terms of how many companies will actually design/manufacture sub-20 nm.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Kudos to the analyst
DrQuine   8/3/2014 6:21:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Congratulations to the analyst for a substantive, technical, "truth to power" analysis.  It may be the first I've ever seen. Usually the analysts just take the buzz on the street and wrap it around the corporate press release. As far as IBM's motivation for "results were deliberately misleading", I'll be interested to see what unfolds. Was it negligence or misdirection because they don't want competitors replicating their approach and builkding upon their early work. I can't see why IBM would have errors in their data when they understand better than anyone else what they're doing. 

TanjB
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Follow up
TanjB   8/3/2014 3:31:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the reference!  Not sure if slide 37 is the right one?  Perhaps you meant 32/33?  And compare to slide 43 where 40 vs. 20 mJ demonstrate that there is a fairly wide latitude in exposure.  Admittedly, that assumes they crank up the power, which reduces thruput.

You are right this has not been a problem with current UV where there are about 15x more photons.  However, EUV should be able to expose in one step what EUV needs 2 or 4 overlayed steps to achieve, so in a sense the shot noise is going to eat into margins donated by not having the errors of multiple steps.

For sure, you are right this kind of problem is new and will get worse.  It works counter to using more sensitive resists, it works counter to higher thruput, and it works counter to finer resolutions.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Steve Wozniak Reacts to Latest iPhone
Max Maxfield
9 comments
Funnily enough, just a few days ago as I pen these words, I was chatting with my wife (Gina the Gorgeous) when she informed me that -- as a kid -- she had never played at making a ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)