Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Limited but cool
rick merritt   8/4/2014 6:40:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Who else is targeting this RF approach?

tb100
User Rank
CEO
focusing RF power
tb100   8/4/2014 9:24:42 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm a little leary of transmitting focused RF power. On the other hand you could put your burrito on top of your phone so it would receive some of that focused power to heat it up.

On a more serious note, I've always wondered if a tiny, very-low-power device could harvest power from all the RF being broadcast all over the place these days: WiFi at 2.4GHz, 5GHz, all the various cell frequencies, even the old UHF,VHF radio and television.

Certainly it is possible to build a tank circuit to capture some of this power. I'm just wondering if it is enough to do anything with. Maybe you could have a sensor that just collects miscellaneous RF power for a few hours, then it could broadcast its data for a few microseconds.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
SAR rating?
resistion   8/4/2014 10:35:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I share tb100's safety concern. What would be the effective SAR rating for this charger?

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
MIMO
Kevin Neilson   8/5/2014 12:08:40 AM
NO RATINGS
This sounds just like MIMO.  It also sounds really difficult.  I'll believe it when I see it.

Jessica Lipsky
User Rank
Author
Re: Limited but cool
Jessica Lipsky   8/5/2014 10:10:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Humavox (http://www.humavox.com/) is using RF, but in a slightly different manner.

Jessica Lipsky
User Rank
Author
Re: Limited but cool
Jessica Lipsky   8/5/2014 10:44:41 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Humavox (http://www.humavox.com/) is using RF, but in a slightly different manner.

Nando Basile
User Rank
Rookie
RF focusing is not trivial
Nando Basile   8/6/2014 5:36:23 AM
NO RATINGS
RF for powering remote sensor networks is an extended topic. IMEC in Belgium, for example, are driving research since quite a bit, now.

WSN can work with less than mW, in duty cycle mode. Anyway, charging-up your mobile telephone is another story, you need Watts for decent recharge time, and since there is FDA regulation, you can't send RF anywhere, so you need to focus in a small spot, avoiding humans and pets.

In this domain, it would be nice to understand how Energous offer is positioned vs. COTA, from OSSIA (http://www.ossiainc.com/about/), that apparently has already a working demonstrator (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_joxrZ6vdYc).

Further, 2.4 GHz is the frequency of WiFi, but maybe other frequencies would be better for remote powering. Your WiFi EIRP has legal limitation (500mW EIRP MAX or 4W at 15% duty-cycle). To charge your phone-up you need to broadcast Watts over distance, so focusing becomes paramount to cope with health regulation.

RF power transfer is the way to go, no doubt, anyway I'd like to carefully see at how good we are in focusing energy in a very limited spot, not touching at people walking around. Any additional data would be appreciated.

 

 

 

ewertz
User Rank
Manager
Re: RF focusing is not trivial
ewertz   8/7/2014 6:10:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I didn't find anywhere that it says that the power being broadcast is going out at 2.4GHz (which would seem to be a less-than-ideal frequency, agreed).  It does, however, use the two aforementioned frequencies (2.4/5 GHz) to locate participating devices.

For example, PowerCast has been at this for a few years, and they use 915MHz.

 

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
Safety and Range - Worth The Trouble?
DrQuine   8/17/2014 3:29:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Besides the safety issues regarding exposure, I wonder what objects will block the signal and prevent charging.  Most people probably don't want to be carefully checking the line-of-sight to their charging home base. I'd think it would be less trouble to connect the phone to a charging cord or a charging dock than to seek out the compatible remote charger (only 15 feet away) and ensure that the devices are coordinating properly to recharge the phone.

Jessica Lipsky
User Rank
Author
Re: Safety and Range - Worth The Trouble?
Jessica Lipsky   8/18/2014 12:13:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, I imagine the objects in a room could potentially prevent easy charging. If the technology could be as accurate in sending a signal as wifi (and we all know wifi is never 100%), perhaps this could really take off. What do you see as ways around this conundrum?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

10 Top Video Parodies on User Interfaces
Max Maxfield
10 comments
As you may know, the people of Scotland are holding a referendum today to decide whether they wish to remain part of the United Kingdom (UK) or to become fully independent and "go it ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)