Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
TanjB
User Rank
Author
Re: No more density expectations
TanjB   8/8/2014 9:29:30 PM
NO RATINGS
@resition That is an unusually through review, quite interesting.

SSD controllers have a history of being stripped down to basics.  A couple of years ago they were typically an ARC processor, stepped up to ARM these days.  The ECC is a major IP block but it probably is more a problem of having rights to a competent design than it is a large number of gates.

In the PCIe era we are going to see "ordinary" drives in the 1TB range have thruputs in the 1.5 to 2.0 GB/s range, about 3x faster than SATA-3.  The NVMe command set is inherently efficient to handle, but still the controller will need to track the sector mappings, plan block erases in advance, infer sequentiality in user patterns, monitor wear levelling, as well as move data.  So we might see some pressure to move to the 28..35 nm range, probably an LP process, in the next wave of controllers.  Especially as the flood gates seem to have opened for 28nm capacity and new chips seem to come out every day.  With more mature design pipeline and less cost/delay on production it won't be long.

I wonder what Novachips is using for the HLSSD controller?  That seems pretty fancy.

 

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: No more density expectations
krisi   8/7/2014 10:19:50 AM
NO RATINGS
thank you @resistion...I just thought that few millions gates would be sufficient for the controller implementation so there is no need to go down to 28nm

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: No more density expectations
resistion   8/7/2014 9:50:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi Kris, one controller I checked(http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/jmicron-jmf667h-ssd-benchmark,3834.html) is made with 55nm, the only reason why further scaling came up is previous post sw guy noted that controller scaling is one way to address slowdown of cost reduction from need for more advanced controllers.

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: No more density expectations
krisi   8/7/2014 9:45:09 AM
NO RATINGS
are controllers really that advanced in manucturing? one generation away from 28nm...I would think 65nm or 90nm would be more than sufficient for any controller, how many gates do you need?

resistion
User Rank
Author
Re: No more density expectations
resistion   8/7/2014 9:19:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed. Controllers are one or two generations away from 28 nm. The more demands, the faster they'll get there.

sw guy
User Rank
Author
Re: No more density expectations
sw guy   8/7/2014 7:05:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Could be, at least partialy, compensated by the fact that controller is until now poised to take full benefit of shrinkage.

Nevertheless, I too have the feeling flash is the only sector I know where manufacters are proud to annouce new *less* reliable product.

resistion
User Rank
Author
No more density expectations
resistion   8/6/2014 10:23:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Whether direct shrinking, more bits per cell, or more vertical layers, the complexity and associated cost is countering the normally expected decrease of cost per bit. The bit quality is degraded. So of course, managing so many bits in one place would place a lot of demand on the controller. The controller cost should therefore be considered in the system cost to be fair. Then flash won't look so cheap anymore.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Leveraging the flash controller
rick merritt   8/6/2014 2:33:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd like to hear wha folks think about the smart flash initiative Samsung is driving at SNIA, NVMe, etc.

Can we access the many flash controllers in a data center to do other jobs or will this be a mess that goes no where...or?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Most Recent Comments
resistion
 
traneus
 
rgeier
 
rgeier
 
Kevin Neilson
 
Susan Rambo
 
Al111
 
rick merritt
 
rgeier
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...