Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Jack.L
User Rank
CEO
Re: INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
Jack.L   8/18/2014 1:14:42 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't understand. 

It sounds like you provided no details of the invention to Intel then other than its existence. Did you have an NDA in place with Intel? If you did, then surely you would have a clear case of violation of that document and not resort to a public posting like you did?

Do you have a patent on this invention?

Stuart2121
User Rank
Rookie
Re: INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
Stuart2121   8/18/2014 1:09:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Jack, but no thanks.

I only told them of the invention, I did not tell them anything specific about it.

NDA & $500,000 disclosure fee, & I'll squawk like a parrot.

Stuart.

Jack.L
User Rank
CEO
Re: INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
Jack.L   8/18/2014 12:54:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Since you are claiming this is now public domain, please feel free to post details of your amazing invention better than anyone else is doing for peer review.

Stuart2121
User Rank
Rookie
INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
Stuart2121   8/17/2014 7:00:26 AM
NO RATINGS
INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL

I invented a CPU cooler - 3 times better than previous best - better than water. Intel have major CPU cooling problems - "Intel's microprocessors were generating so much heat that they were melting" (iht.com) - try to talk to them - they send my communications to my competitor & will not talk to me

Winners of major 'Corporate Social Responsibility' awardS!!

Huh!!!! When did RICO get repealed?"

INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!

BTW, I have the evidence - my competitor gave it to me.

BBTW, I am prepared to apologize to Intel if;

• They can show that the actions were those of a single individual in the company, acting outside corporate policy, and:

• They gain redress on my behalf.

Inventors - help your fellow inventors - share your experiences with companies - good and bad.

Gondalf
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: 1T sram
Gondalf   8/14/2014 8:20:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel 0.092un2 22nm sram cell was 1T too. So it is not a news.

The real issue they are pretty slow and power hungry.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: Naah
Sheetal.Pandey   8/12/2014 11:30:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I dont think Google or Apple can disrupt INtel. Google being a ppredominantly web company can try in hardware but being successful or even being in the market would be a challenge. Hardware is a different business it doesnt work like web. They may scratch for some time and leave it. Apple also may not be go very long in hardware design.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Naah
rick merritt   8/12/2014 11:32:52 AM
NO RATINGS
@Simon: Charlie Sporck was ahead of my time, but I know National CEO Brian Halla tried to beat Intel in CPUs and failed, using the Cyrix core, I believe.

Simon7382
User Rank
Manager
Naah
Simon7382   8/12/2014 3:21:42 AM
I would not trust much the opinion of someone with Transmeta credentials regarding microprocessors. Intel's strength is not in microprocessor architecture but in semiconductor processing, in which it is by 2.5-3 generations ahead of the next guy. Google would be really dumb trying to take on Intel in microprocessors. It is VERY far away from their core competence. Charlie Sporck was one of the greats of the semiconductor industry and he lost his job at Nat Semi because he tried and failed to take on Intel in microprocessors. The Nat Semi processor was MUCH better architecturally than the x86 architecture (and it was optimized to run Unix) but Intel easily won because Nat Semi could not compete in IC manufacturing.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Nvidia abandons 64-bit Denver chip for servers
rick merritt   8/11/2014 9:30:39 PM
NO RATINGS
@Douglas: Thanks for the link.

Nvidia announced Denver for mobile SoCs here at Hot Chips today, but it the server segment has clearly become very competitive ahead of any market traction.

DougInRB
User Rank
Manager
Re: If the headline ends in a question mark ...
DougInRB   8/11/2014 5:09:30 PM
I agree.

Apple/Google/Amazon/etc. may be able to spend a bunch of $$$$$ to save a few $$ for themselves.  Who else would use their custom CPU?  Given the tremendous investment required to maintain the processor infrastructure (compilers, memory interfaces, I/O hubs, annual product refresh, etc.), I can't see this being anything more than an attempt to get Intel to lower their prices.

Google and others must do what they do best - and it isn't making CPUs.  They may choose a different CPU company that better meets their needs, but I can't imagine there ever being a benefit of becoming a CPU company.

The biggest threat to Intel's CPU business  are the likes of Janet Reno...

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want a Voltera Desktop PCB Printer?
Max Maxfield
9 comments
I just received an email from my chum Javi in Spain. "Have you heard about Voltera (VolteraInc.com)? It's a Canadian company that is going to offer desktop-size PCB printers for fast ...

Aubrey Kagan

Have You Ever Been Blindsided by Your Own Design?
Aubrey Kagan
37 comments
I recently read GCHQ: The uncensored story of Britain's most sensitive intelligence agency by Richard J. Aldrich. The Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ), Britain's equivalent of ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...