Yep, nice turn of phrase Karen! Brought to mind an old movie - "King Frat" the highlight of which was a farting competition...which was won by a girl. A bit like National Lampoon, but worse..... (You weren't an actress in a past life were you?? :-)
@DavidAshton "Yep, nice turn of phrase Karen! Brought to mind an old movie - "King Frat" the highlight of which was a farting competition...which was won by a girl. A bit like National Lampoon, but worse..... (You weren't an actress in a past life were you?? :-)"
A girl won the competition, eh? How unladylike! I was an aspiring actress in like second grade or so, but I couldn't stop giggling uncontrollably when I read my lines, so they put me to work behind stage. :-)
@maxmaxfield :So if they'd had a larger budget, the operating system would have been allowed to access the other half of the RAM?"
I emailed Andrea Accomazzo of ESA to shed some light on your question and here is his answer:
"Yes, we could use part of the RAM extension but the CPU budget would decrease i.e. we would have the risk that the computer would not be able to run all the actions it has to run within the allocated time i.e. activities on-board would start being delayed which would be catastrophic for the mission.
Proper timing of orbital and attitude manoeuvres is essential for mission success. If the spacecraft can not execute them then we could not manoeuvre properly around the comet.
In reality the on-board computer has a protection against over-run but it would re-boot thus entering a safe status where all programmed activities would be de-scheduled i.e. the mission would be temporarily interrupted with an obvious disruption of science production and delays."
The fact that Rosetta has traveled billions of miles to find and orbit a comet that is only 2.5 miles by 2.2 miles is extraordinary. As I understand, escape velocity from the comet is about 1 mph so if we walked on the surface, we'd "launch" off the surface, leave the comet's gravitational field, and be floating in space. It is hard to imagine the fine adjustments that must be made by Rosetta to remain in the vicinity.
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.