Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
prousseau
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Moore's law
prousseau   8/21/2014 6:47:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm curious on your statement Intel use SADP, it this a fact they shared after the webcast, or your guess; I did not hear this in webcast.  SADP is not free

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: scalable to 10 nm
resistion   8/15/2014 10:59:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Anyone can estimate from the SRAM picture that Lg is 24-27 nm at 14 nm node. It's already leveling off.

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Rookie
Multiple patterning cheapest after all
double-o-nothing   8/13/2014 9:47:00 AM
NO RATINGS
14 nm must have lots of double patterning and triple patterning, much more so than 22 nm. It must mean ASML and the analysts have overestimated the cost of the steps being repeated.

escher
User Rank
Manager
Re: Intel has a lead?
escher   8/12/2014 11:32:18 PM
NO RATINGS
@3D guy - Intel gets plenty of incentives from the state of Oregon, Ireland and Israel. Not so sure about Arizona and New Mexico, but I imagine there must be a big carrot to keep them in these 2 dry states where water is at a premium.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: cost
resistion   8/12/2014 9:12:29 PM
NO RATINGS
It would be interesting to see implications for its foundry business. It may or may not translate directly.

Simon7382
User Rank
Manager
Re: cost
Simon7382   8/12/2014 8:29:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Intell is better, that simple. They are ahead of the rest of the indostry by at least 2 generations.

HJ88
User Rank
Freelancer
Intel's Achievements
HJ88   8/12/2014 11:19:55 AM
The technical achievements by Intel at 14nm are excellent. Achieving 0.53 area scaling compared to 22nm requires incredibly complex processing technology for control of fin height, pitch, and passivation coverage.

The next step of manufacturing 50K or 80K wafers per month with high yields and high reliability is another order of magnitude in complexity. Let us hope for the electronics industry that Intel will achieve its goal of reaching high volume production in Q1 or Q2/2015.

The other vendors of FIN-based products have similar challenges to Intel, and it is realistic to expect them to have a similar time line between when the process was initially stable to when high volume of cost competitive products that also have high reliability is achieved.

Intel's progress to date is an outstanding achievement by the company and its ecosystem partners.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
Re: cost
resistion   8/12/2014 9:31:24 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't know if it's that Intel uses SADP while foundries use LELE. SADP would restrict layouts strongly, which fits Intel's manufacturing style (they used to be a memory company). Another is they they staged their big technology transitions over many generations (45 nm high-k, 32 nm immersion, 22 nm FinFET, 14 nm double patterning). Instead of one big barrier at 2X nm.

Gondalf
User Rank
Freelancer
Re: SRAM size
Gondalf   8/12/2014 8:57:03 AM
NO RATINGS
To be fair TSMC has never said they are equal density at 16nm node (they said will catch up at the 10nm node).

Edited.

Asking to other engineers: TSMC and Samsung cells are 1T fin, Intel cell is 2T fins so the comparison is not fair. 

Very likely both TSMC and Samsung will utilize a larger 2T cell for faster phone SOCs, still it is only a my idea. Sure the 1T cofiguaration is a limiting factor in abailable clock speed ad low power consumption.

We'll see Intel SOC process, it is unlikely an even smaller cell footprint for certain applications with 1T layout, like is happened on 22nm with the 1T 0.092um2 cell.

3D Guy
User Rank
Manager
Intel has a lead?
3D Guy   8/12/2014 8:44:26 AM
NO RATINGS
A question that always comes up for me when I see Mark Bohr boasting about Intel's process technology load over TSMC:

Intel may show TSMC having higher gate pitch x metal pitch. But I think the true comparison would be cost per transistor. TSMC owns significantly cheaper fabs than Intel, thanks to much better government incentives than exist in Taiwan (vs. the US). My experience is that the cost difference can be ~30% or sometimes even more. I wonder if Intel really has a significant lead in cost per transistor?

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Analog Faceplate Design Decisions: Art or Science?
Max Maxfield
19 comments
My degree is in Control Engineering -- a core of math with "surrounding subjects" of electronics, mechanics, and hydraulics and fluidics. The only official programming I did as part of ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
3 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...