Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
3D Guy
User Rank
Author
Moore's law
3D Guy   8/11/2014 6:22:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Congratulations to the Intel team on a phenomenal engineering achievement. Keeping the cost per transistor going down by doing higher aspect ratio fins, boosting drive current and lowering transistor area needed is great.

I wonder, though, whether Intel can really boast that Moore's Law is alive and well... the yield challenge of high aspect ratio fins cost a year of delays (thereby the cost per transistor went down by 2x after 3 years instead of 2)... it also caused loss of face for Intel with major customers like Apple. 

buprestid
User Rank
Author
SRAM size
buprestid   8/11/2014 8:21:08 PM
Not bad for the SRAM size.

Intel : 0.0588 sq. um

Samsung : 0.064 sq. um ISSCC 2014

TSMC : 0.07 sq. um IEDM 2013

 

resistion
User Rank
Author
scalable to 10 nm
resistion   8/11/2014 9:03:39 PM
NO RATINGS
The same SADP techniques can scale to 10 nm, but tighter gate scaling looks dangerous.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: Moore's law
rick merritt   8/11/2014 9:34:26 PM
@3D Guy: As Moore himeself said, before scaling stops it will slow down

 

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
Re: SRAM size
GroovyGeek   8/11/2014 9:37:14 PM
Buprestid You do realize you are comparing a shipping product to a conference paper presentation. Real SRAM cell sizes are substantially larger than what is advertised at conferences. I guess in a few years wwhen they get aroundto sshipping 14nm we will know.

alex_m1
User Rank
Author
cost
alex_m1   8/11/2014 11:12:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder how can Intel reduce transistor costs while the rest of the industry cannot ? what's different ?

buprestid
User Rank
Author
Re: SRAM size
buprestid   8/12/2014 3:21:26 AM
NO RATINGS
For these process parameters is there anyway to compare actual numbers? Just some conference papers and some slides here and there.


Intel comes out with the Gate Pitch x Metal Pitch in November 2013 that says they are much better.

TSMC rebuts that claim saying they are equal density at 16nm node.

Intel reiterates again from the chart here they have a denser far cheaper process.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
Re: SRAM size
GroovyGeek   8/12/2014 3:35:35 AM
Yes head to head comparisons are tough, but in this case Intel is not showing a PowerPoint but an actual product. TSMC will not ship anything they define as 14nm for at least a year, and in volume even later. Historically their SHIPPING SRAM sizes have been 10-20% larger than what has been advertised in papers, probably to meet SNM and other requirements.

3D Guy
User Rank
Author
Intel has a lead?
3D Guy   8/12/2014 8:44:26 AM
NO RATINGS
A question that always comes up for me when I see Mark Bohr boasting about Intel's process technology load over TSMC:

Intel may show TSMC having higher gate pitch x metal pitch. But I think the true comparison would be cost per transistor. TSMC owns significantly cheaper fabs than Intel, thanks to much better government incentives than exist in Taiwan (vs. the US). My experience is that the cost difference can be ~30% or sometimes even more. I wonder if Intel really has a significant lead in cost per transistor?

Gondalf
User Rank
Author
Re: SRAM size
Gondalf   8/12/2014 8:57:03 AM
NO RATINGS
To be fair TSMC has never said they are equal density at 16nm node (they said will catch up at the 10nm node).

Edited.

Asking to other engineers: TSMC and Samsung cells are 1T fin, Intel cell is 2T fins so the comparison is not fair. 

Very likely both TSMC and Samsung will utilize a larger 2T cell for faster phone SOCs, still it is only a my idea. Sure the 1T cofiguaration is a limiting factor in abailable clock speed ad low power consumption.

We'll see Intel SOC process, it is unlikely an even smaller cell footprint for certain applications with 1T layout, like is happened on 22nm with the 1T 0.092um2 cell.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.

Brought to you by

July 16, 1pm EDT Thursday
IoT Network Shoot Out
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...