Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
3D Guy
User Rank
Author
Intel's response to this article...
3D Guy   8/12/2014 4:57:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm curious to see how Intel responds to this article. From what Mr. Or-Bach says here, it looks like their announcements of SRAM cell size may not be consistent with each other. Intel keeps saying Moore's Law is alive and well, but is cost per transistor really scaling once every 2 years as it used to? Isn't there a 2.5-3 year gap between 22nm and 14nm? Looking forward to hearing Mark Bohr/Intel's response. Maybe EETimes can contact him for comment? 

ScottenJ
User Rank
Author
Re: Intel's response to this article...
ScottenJ   8/12/2014 5:59:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel previously stated that wafer cost increased by 27% for 14nm over 22nm. The SRAM cell size at 22nm was 0.092um2 and for 14nm is 0.588um2. 1.27x cost divided by 1.56 density = 0.81 cost.

beinglass
User Rank
Author
Transistors vs. interconnects
beinglass   8/12/2014 6:12:55 PM
NO RATINGS
The new report from Intel detailing the long awaiting 14nm process shows an amazing transistor structure with 2 new features.

1. Higher fins 42 vs.34nm of 14 vs. 22nm nodes

2. Non tapered (vertical fins) which is quite deviation from the 22 nm process.


I'm not sure what will the competitors (Samsung, TSMC GF) are planning for their fins' shape. It will be very interesting to see.

However I have not seen any revelation with regards to the back end and especially with the interconnect section of the process (BEOL). Looks like the transistors are getting better and better but the BEOL is basically stays the same. In that case are we seeing diminished return? Or the solution will be to yet adding more metal layers, also what about first metal layers CD, how small narrow can we make them.

AKH0
User Rank
Author
SRAM size comparison
AKH0   8/12/2014 6:21:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually the smallest cell published so far is the "10nm" cell shown at VLSI earlier this year. With a gate pitch of 64nm, metal pitch of 48nm, and the same fin pitch of 42nm, it was a bit smaller at 0.053 um2.

Also, a fair comparison for Intel vs Intel would be the 0.108um2 cell in 22nm which had the same 2-fin NFET design that was shown here. The 0.092um2 cell had only one fin per transistor. The 2-fin cell here has a width of 420nm. A single-fin cell would had a width of (420-84 nm) and an area of roughly 0.047um2, which would put it at 0.51X compared to the corresponding 1-fin cell in 22nm. However, a single-fin SRAM would have poor charactersitics, because it does not have the right beta ratio (PD>PG>PU).

 

resistion
User Rank
Author
double patterning cost double take
resistion   8/12/2014 9:22:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Most analysts have predicted double patterning would start increasing cost per transistor, very inconsistent with the trend shown by Intel. Why such a big difference? What's TSMC's trend for 20 nm?

sranje
User Rank
Author
eDRAM
sranje   8/13/2014 10:10:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Thank you for persistence...

Didn't couple of days ago EETimes published an article about Intel's eDRAM use? Samsung was mentioned also

The article discussed the issue that SRAM size is not decreasing... 

 

AKH0
User Rank
Author
Re: eDRAM
AKH0   8/13/2014 11:08:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, at a given node eDRAM is 4-5 times smaller than SRAM. IBM has been using eDRAM on the same processor chips and some of the game chips for a few years (since 45nm) and that's how they huge caches on the server chips. Intel's 22nm eDRAM however was a standalone chip packaged together with a processor. It is possible to see more of this packaging solutions and extensions to 3D in the future.

ScottenJ
User Rank
Author
Re: double patterning cost double take
ScottenJ   8/13/2014 11:28:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Some analysts have predicted rising cost per transistor due to multi patterning but not all have. In fact a lot of the predictions are the work of one analyst repeated by many. My modeling shows a cost reduction at 20nm for TSMC although not as big a reduction as we "typically" see and what I am hearing from early adopters that is what is happening.

Or_Bach
User Rank
Author
Re: double patterning cost double take
Or_Bach   8/13/2014 11:59:50 AM
NO RATINGS
The costing of advance nodes leave a very large room for creative accounting as a large part of the cost is the capital depreciation.

But there is additional aspect that is ignored in the general discussion but have huge impact on the industry adaption trend - per design development costs.

The design cost escalate rapidly with scaling. And the industry has responded accordingly. Quoting from our blog FPGAs as ASIC Alternatives: Past & Future - "In his last keynote presentation at the Synopsys user group (SNUG 2014), Art De Geus, Synopsys CEO, presented multiple slides to illustrate the value of Synopsys newer tools to improve older node design effectiveness. .... One can easily see that the most popular current design node is at 180nm."

So while we argue about 14 nm vs. 28 nm most new design are choosing 180 nm !

Clearly the semiconductor game have changed

AKH0
User Rank
Author
Re: SRAM size comparison
AKH0   8/13/2014 1:12:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Just to clarify, if you plot the data over multiple generation, the SRAM area scaling has never been 0.5X per node. It was mostly ~0.6x per node. 32nm was a little bit more agressive and 22nm was a less aggressive one. But the long run trend has been about 0.6x per node.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.