Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Luddy0
User Rank
Rookie
Re: plausible?
Luddy0   8/27/2014 8:09:33 PM
NO RATINGS
thanks, will stay tuned!

-Luddy

fdacosta
User Rank
Rookie
Re: plausible?
fdacosta   8/27/2014 5:56:26 PM
NO RATINGS
@Luddy0. More to come in the next blog. Some of it is described in my book, specifically the importance of a self classifying "chirp" protocol. Open Source communities will maintain and manage the chirp taxonomy but in organic fashion as in Nature, see the presentation made at the IOT world event, and on my linked in page (cannot post URL) And it will  be covered in next blog entry and looking forward to your comments then. Thanks for posting your comments. Francis  

Luddy0
User Rank
Rookie
plausible?
Luddy0   8/26/2014 10:41:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd love to be optimistic about this, but I just don't see how it works from the point of view of the consumers of this data.  How can I operate on a stream of data whose format and meaning I learn dynamically, by discovery?

It reminds me a little of the premise of XML: by adopting a 'universal' format whose syntax is self-describing, we can share information from all kinds of sources easily.  But has this promise really materialized?  Are there systems that process XML sources whose meaning (rather than syntax) isn't independently standardized?  I don't see it happening, and I don't understand how this case can be any different.  The syntax side of XML works well enough, but the dynamic semantic side has gone nowhere.

If I create a device that does something new, takes some kind of reading from its environment and then announces the availability of this data, how can I write a consumer of that data without having prepared ahead of time to receive exactly that kind of data?  I guess I can believe that I might be able to adapt to different formats for the data, but different categories of data altogether?  I just don't see it.  It sounds too abstract to me.  That's especially so considering the volume of data which it is claimed will be available.

This is apart from the question of building an infrastructure that is prepared for several orders of magnitude more devices to begin publishing their presence.

I see IOT being successful in restricted environments where a changing population of devices with very tightly prescribed capabilities either operates in concert or under the control of a server(s).  This more abstracted vision of vague capabilities announcing themselves: hard for me to believe.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Vetinari Clock: Decisions, Decisions, Decisions …
Max Maxfield
22 comments
Things are bouncing merrily along with regard to my uber-cool Vetinari Clock project. The wooden cabinet is being handcrafted by my chum Bob (a master carpenter) using an amazing ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...