Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
betajet
User Rank
CEO
"Deliberately repeating other people's mistakes"
betajet   8/28/2014 3:38:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Computer science pioneer David Wheeler on the subject of compatibility:
Compatibility means deliberately repeating other people's mistakes.

[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wheeler_%28computer_scientist%29]

betajet
User Rank
CEO
8086 is backward compatible to 8080 and 8008
betajet   8/28/2014 3:33:09 PM
NO RATINGS
The Intel 8086 is in turn backward-compatible at the assembly language level to the 8-bit Intel 8080 and 8008.  Intel provided a tool to machine-translate 8080 ASM source code into 8086.  For the most part it was fully automatic, but there were a few instructions that needed manual intervention.  Even so, it made it cheap to port 8080 software to 8086, providing instant software for 8086 and 8088.

The automatically-translated code used 8-bit registers and didn't take full advantage of 8086's 16-bit instructions, so you didn't get any performance improvement.  If memory serves, the new 4.77 MHz IBM PC ran early software slower than an 8 MHz Z-80 computer in spite of the PC's 16-bit 8088 processor.

_hm
User Rank
CEO
New generation and risk vs return
_hm   8/28/2014 12:00:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Younger and new generation will take higher risk to move away from compatibility and offer best solution to customer. That is good thinking and can get very good result of high return.

Innovation should not be restricted for compatibility reason.

philmck
User Rank
Rookie
It's a dilemma for customers as well
philmck   8/28/2014 10:53:31 AM
NO RATINGS
I used to help manage compatibility at Symbian (the smarphone operating system company), and I agree it's a constant dilemma. If you want your customers to buy your latest product, they need to know how much time and effort will be involved in migrating their old applications, hardware, working methods and so on. It's no good just saying "we don't support the old product any more" and expecting customers to stay loyal ([cough] Windows XP).

It's a dilemma for customers as well. They need a migration path - information about how and when to modify anything that relies on compatibililty with your product so they can assess what will continue to work after an upgrade and what won't, what the costs and timescales will be and weigh those costs against the benefits of upgrading. If you spell that out for customers, they will tell you how much effort to spend on compatibility. As you say above, "Some of the best ideas come from our customers."

You may be suprised to find some old (and even new) features are almost completely unused and hence there's no point spending time and money supporting them. They should be deprecated and eventually removed. On the other hand, you may be pleasantly surprised to find that some original features you thought were obsolete are actually still heavily used (even though better alternatives exist) but no-one complains because they "just work".

If breaking compatibility is more in your interest than your customer's, it may be worth making a migration tool or offering free assistance if an upgrade goes wrong.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Tiny Kickstarter MCU Board Provides 'Smart Fusion' for IoT Systems
Max Maxfield
2 comments
Just a few minutes ago as I pen this words, I received an email from my chum Mike Hibbert, who is a columnist for the computer and electronics hobbyist magazine Everyday Practical ...

EDN Staff

11 Summer Vacation Spots for Engineers
EDN Staff
20 comments
This collection of places from technology history, museums, and modern marvels is a roadmap for an engineering adventure that will take you around the world. Here are just a few spots ...

Glen Chenier

Engineers Solve Analog/Digital Problem, Invent Creative Expletives
Glen Chenier
15 comments
- An analog engineer and a digital engineer join forces, use their respective skills, and pull a few bunnies out of a hat to troubleshoot a system with which they are completely ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
46 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)