SAN FRANCISCO--Nano-imprint lithography holds great promise in the areas of biotechnology, MEMS, semiconductors, and other sectors, but the technology also faces some major hurdles, according to the keynote speaker at the first-ever Nanoimprint and Nanoprint Technology (NNT) conference here today.
Nano-imprint lithography is a new and "disruptive" technology. Tools based on the technology do not utilize an optical lens, but rather it makes use of ultraviolet (UV) and liquid immersion techniques to enable or "imprint" patterns on a wafer.
It is also a possible threat to current next-generation lithography (NGL) efforts, such as electron-projection lithography (EPL) and extreme ultraviolet (EUV), said Roger Fabian Pease, a professor at the department of electrical engineering at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif.
Suppliers of nano-imprint lithography tools "are getting features down to 20-nm," Pease said. "If the EUV guys were doing that, it would be on the front page of the New York Times," he joked during his keynote at NNT event here today.
Joking aside, Pease pointed out that current NGL technologies face several major problems, thereby opening the door for nano-imprint lithography in the marketplace. "We know the EUV guys are having trouble getting a source," he said. "The EPL guys are having trouble with electrons flying apart."
This is not to say that nano-imprint is a slam-dunk. In fact, tool suppliers still face three problems: photomask, overlay, and inspection, he said.
Given that this technology utilizes a 1X reduction ratio, the ability to develop and supply cost-effective masks will remain an issue. "If we're going to get e-beams to market with 1X mask, then we must get the focal points down on the tools," he said. "Most of the e-beams are also stuck with a throughput problem."
Inspection is another issue. "The current KLA machines are not set up for nano-imprint technology yet," he said, referring to wafer-inspection giant KLA-Tencor Corp.
Still, there are some major breakthroughs in the market. Paving the way for a new class of applications, startup Molecular Imprints Inc. (MII) of Austin, Tex. recently unveiled its first product--a tool aimed at the emerging "nano-imprint" lithography market, (see Dec. 2 story ). And other nano-imprint startups are going after the NGL market with tools said to process chips at 10-nm (see Dec. 6 story ).
RSS
Digital
10 emerging technologies to watch:
EE Times has compiled a list of emerging technologies that we think will be worth watching out for in 2010. Biofeedback or thought-control of electronics are among the contenders.
Hot applications in 2010:
We've compiled a list of 10 technology applications you should watch for in 2010, ranging from e-book readers to 3-D TVs. We examine the features that make these apps so compelling as well unresolved issues.
Top 25 predictions for semis in 2010:
2010 is just beginning to unfold in the electronics industry. Looking into our crystal ball, we have released our own chip forecasts--and other predictions--for 2010.
Seven things to fix in 2010:
The editors of EE Times came up with their own informal list of things we hope engineers fix in 2010, spanning everything from nano-lithography to space travel. What do you want to see get done this year?
'09 moves that are shaping the future:
This was a brutal year, but the industry gets a nod for showing grace under fire. Here's our Top 10 guide to the coming year, illustrating what to expect in 2010.
10 CEOs out in 2009:
It's been a tough year for the global electronics industry and CEOs. We survey the dismissal of 10 industry CEOs during the first three quarters of 2009 and what's ahead for the rest of the year.
Notable women in microelectronics:
There is no better time than a global economic recession to examine the keys to successful corporate governance. So, EE Times has compiled an international list that celebrates women who are business and technology leaders in semis.
EE Times updates Silicon 60:
Seventeen companies have been added to the lastest version of our Silicon 60 list of emerging startups. Forty-three companies survived as emerging companies that are still worth watching.
RSS| 
Digital| 
Mobile
