I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
I agree with you that semi IP is a lost cause or at least a business with very limited growth potential. We tried to sell WiMAX PHY IP for the past 4 years and here is our conclusion:
1. Customers not willing to pay for all the extra work that we have to do to prove the IP (silicon, certification, compatibility with other IP such as RF, MAC, etc.). Will need big investments upfront to make the IP ready or forego profits until the IP is proven, but that entails that the IP lifespan is quite long (which is usually not the case) to make it profitable. The downside is that there is very few VC who are interested in funding IP ventures and for good reasons.
2. Revenues are not guaranteed. How to track and enforce royalties payment?
3. No forcible safeguards against IP theft or misappropriation. These two last points will become hot issues in a increasingly global semi industry.
There still a possibility for IP vendors to do well by building comprehensive application specific IP (ASIP) libraries (e.g. analog, signal processing, low power, etc.) and designing quality IP to differentiate themselves in a globally proliferating market. The business model will be to license complete libraries to semi fabs, EDA vendors, ASIC vendors, etc. Limitation is lack of money needed to produce these quality IP!
There is still might a chance to save the cause if IP vendors don't loose their faith.
Best regards,
Hanni Bagnordi
SiWave Corp.