United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMEMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSSMost Popular contentTrusted Sources

 


Here comes the SDR hype
Print this article Email this article Reprints RSS Digital Edition

EE Times


STRAUSS_WILLForget 2.5G, third generation (3G) or even 4G. Software-defined radio (SDR) is the hottest term in wireless today. Many products are being introduced as "SDR components" or "SDR-ready" devices, simply because their bandwidth is deemed sufficient to handle a variety of air interfaces. That's almost akin to the uninteruptible power supply vendor that calls its PC products "Internet" power protectors.

One major semiconductor company is so bold as to call its wideband digital down- and upconverters "the only true SDR ICs." Those components may be necessary pieces of the puzzle, but they're far from sufficient. And an antenna with a bandwidth wide enough to handle several cellular frequencies can be called an "SDR antenna," though no SDR system exists.

So, what is SDR? Well, there's no official definition, so we'll offer one: an adaptable radio transceiver system that learns and adapts to transmission and channel environments with software.

In cellular, the goal is to dynamically adapt to any of several air interfaces, such as GSM, GPRS, W-CDMA, cdma2000 and so on, through software detection and dynamic reconfigurability. In concept, it's like today's trimode cell phones, but those devices simply "switch" receiver and transmitter circuits for the predefined air interfaces, rather than employ a single, common RF front end.

I'll reiterate that no SDR system yet exists commercially, although some of our three-letter agencies and the military have long employed very wideband receivers that accept most of the radio spectrum and analyze the signals found through massive DSP computation. Such electronic intelligence systems have been continually improved over the years, but we aren't aware of any implementations that also adapt a transmitter to match the detected signal, as true SDR must do.

For the future cellular SDR environment, a number of questions remain. Should basestations be the only dynamically adaptable system elements or should cell phones be adaptable? If both are SDR-capable, would the cell phone and the basestations continually hunt for a common air interface? How much DSP horsepower will be needed? And should the DSP engine employ reconfigurable architecture or is context switching sufficient?

The key question is, "What features could an SDR cellular system offer that aren't available with today's 2.5G and 3G technology?" Until the last question is answered-with an indication of additional profit for the operators-there is no impetus to implement SDR any time soon.

Will Strauss is President of Forward Concepts (www.forwardconcepts.com).





The views and opinions expressed in this column are strictly those of the author and should not be taken as an editorial position of EE Times or any of its other editors, publications or Web sites.


  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Looking for a new job?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
SRC Expands R&D Centers
The Semiconductor Research Corp has added a new center to its university R&D efforts.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.


All White Papers »   

 
Education and
Learning


Learn Now:












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features




All materials on this site Copyright © 2009 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Service | About