United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMEMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSSMost Popular contentTrusted Sources

 


Soft switch's security woe
Print this article Email this article Reprints RSS Digital Edition

EE Times


WIRBEL_LORINGThe soft switch is a great solution for mediation between Signaling System 7 and Internet Protocol (IP) networks, albeit one that seemed perpetually destined for future greatness. In articles I've written for EE Times and in this column, I've talked about the problems that the soft-switch community faces in deployment, the primary one being the fact that so many next-generation carriers have bitten the dust in 2001.

In a fascinating presentation at the recent Communications Design Conference, Randy Richter of Unisphere Networks suggested the near-term scenario is worse than we thought. Richter said there's still a fundamental disconnect between the "stupid" model of soft switch, following IP-centric client-server models and using Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) proxies; and the "intelligent" model from the telephony world. The latter follows the Advanced Intelligent Network model of deployment and assumes the use of Megaco gateways.

In deployment, Richter said, the stupid SIP model should be favored, since it eases client rollouts for newer carriers and allows wider use of IP services. But without a master-slave arrangement in the net, it's unclear how the carrier could bill for services that two SIP clients set up peer-to-peer.

The scenario gets worse when we consider the Communication Assistance to Law Enforcement Act. Since the SIP model makes it more difficult for a carrier to prove to the FBI that it can tap packets, there is very little incentive for proliferating SIP proxies.

By contrast, the soft-switch set up as a call agent or media gateway controller uses the intelligence of the central network and lets carriers maintain five-nines reliability. It also allows carriers to prove to the federal government that all packet traffic, voice or data, can in theory be tapped. Richter's conclusion was that "stupid may be better, but intelligent will be deployed first."

But neither is looking too good. Richter concluded with an analysis of a recent RHK Inc. survey, conducted before Sept. 11. What RHK called the worst-case scenario, of continued contraction through mid-2002, Richter now calls, "the best we can hope for." That scenario sees a slight increase of high-density media gateways, and a flat market for soft switches.

Richter said that putting the incumbent carriers in the driver's seat assures slow growth for soft switches, and that the heightened security craze for central offices and Internet points of presence will virtually assure that intelligent media gateways trump the peer-based SIP proxies in a big way. The soft switch just can't get any respect.





The views and opinions expressed in this column are strictly those of the author and should not be taken as an editorial position of EE Times or any of its other editors, publications or Web sites.


  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Looking for a new job?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
SRC Expands R&D Centers
The Semiconductor Research Corp has added a new center to its university R&D efforts.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.


All White Papers »   

 
Education and
Learning


Learn Now:












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features




All materials on this site Copyright © 2009 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Service | About