United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMEMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSSMost Popular contentTrusted Sources

 


Reinventing the wheel
Print this article Email this article Reprints RSS Digital Edition

EE Times


BIER_JEFFIn the early days of the automotive industry, every car was a unique, handcrafted specimen-even mundane items like pistons were one of a kind. This changed in 1908, when Cadillac disassembled three Model Ks, mixed the parts together and then built three running cars from the hodgepodge. Today, this feat seems wholly unremarkable; even cars as seemingly dissimilar as Fords and Jaguars often share major components. One of the great lessons of the 20th-century automotive industry is that differences between vehicles should exist only where they add value.

In some ways, developers of DSP systems, chips and software are no further along today than the auto industry was in 1908. Much of their effort is expended in reinventing commonplace components instead of building features that create product differentiation and add value-and this despite the typical constraints of short design cycles and limited engineering resources.

Why don't product developers rely more heavily on preexisting components? Much of the answer lies in the difficulty of obtaining and integrating components from disparate vendors.

Fortunately, processor vendors seem to be taking notice of this situation. For example, Motorola and Telcordia recently announced the availability of a "feature phone" solution that includes a processor, voice-coding and network-interface software, and development support. Similarly, Texas Instruments recently introduced its "reference frameworks" family of productiongrade software templates that provide the basic nuts and bolts needed to integrate product-specific code with third-party algorithms, hardware drivers and so on. These products promise to shift development from critical but nondifferentiating components to value-added features.

Perhaps the most important benefit of this "prepackaged" approach is that it lowers the technical barriers of entry. Suppose a company with little DSP expertise wants to add DSP features to an existing product. Developing this expertise in-house may be prohibitively time-consuming and expensive, making an off-the-shelf solution attractive. As DSP features are merged into a range of embedded applications, this scenario is likely to become common, and processor vendors that can provide the right mix of hardware, software and development support stand to gain an upper hand.

Jeff Bier is the General Manager of Berkeley Design Technology Inc. (www.bdti.com), a DSP Technology Analysis and Software Development Company. Kenton Williston of BDTI contributed to this column.





The views and opinions expressed in this column are strictly those of the author and should not be taken as an editorial position of EE Times or any of its other editors, publications or Web sites.


  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Looking for a new job?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
SRC Expands R&D Centers
The Semiconductor Research Corp has added a new center to its university R&D efforts.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.


All White Papers »   

 
Education and
Learning


Learn Now:












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features




All materials on this site Copyright © 2009 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Service | About