United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMEMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSSMost Popular contentTrusted Sources

 


Dc/dc designers ponder bus, point-of-load options
Print this article Email this article Reprints RSS Digital Edition

EE Times


BIANOCOMANO_VINCENT

The message seems clear: When it comes to power distribution for ever-evolving data, telecom, industrial systems and the like, the industry won't be converging on one standard for the intermediate-bus voltage. Nor will there be a universal maxim dictating architectural form for the advanced point-of-load (POL) dc/dc converters that power these systems, the recent alliance of Artesyn, Astec and Texas Instruments notwithstanding.

There are just too many market segments, and with complexity will still come confusion. Incredibly, there's often not even agreement on placing a point-of-load converter right at the load to maximize efficiency, which is supposedly the reason for the POL's existence. All of this means varying bus voltages, new sublevel power bus architectures, more bus designs hugging the 3.3- and 5-volt regions, and step-up converter topologies driven from those lower bus voltages to power systems, just to name a few.

"People would have you think there's a standards push for a 12-V bus, or a 7- to 9-V bus or whatever, but none of that is even remotely true," says one industry observer. "What's going to define the bus is the application." Vendors need to operate in an environment that encourages compatibility but at the same time puts some distance between their product and the competitors'. And when it comes to dc/dc converters, only so much is in the vendors' control. That's because today's demands for expanding functionality in PC and microprocessor-based systems are launching power structures in directions that are often ill-defined, seemingly unlimited in number and form and, occasionally, independent.

So expect more customization, not necessarily standardization, as a consequence of diversification. Bus structures, and the POL converter solutions for servicing the 50-watt-and-below region in particular, are still wide open. Multichip module, standalone IC, discrete converter-they're all used, and none yet demonstrate an edge that would have designers flocking to one over another.

Device-wise, we've seen the first monolithic 3.3-V step-up IC with a fair amount of current delivery for powering 5-V systems. Other outgrowths of customization could well include a wide range of dc/dc chips that are truly self-contained-that is, having no external components whatsoever, yet delivering much greater power. The whole of the development picture creates issues, but for the moment only for those of us who need to explain what it all means to the designer.





The views and opinions expressed in this column are strictly those of the author and should not be taken as an editorial position of EE Times or any of its other editors, publications or Web sites.


  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Looking for a new job?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
SRC Expands R&D Centers
The Semiconductor Research Corp has added a new center to its university R&D efforts.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.


All White Papers »   

 
Education and
Learning


Learn Now:












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features




All materials on this site Copyright © 2009 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Service | About