United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMELATEST NEWSSEMICONDUCTORSMOST POPULARMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSS

 

Bluetooth is dead








EE Times


MATHIAS_CRAIG

There, I've said it. I feel better already. I've been thinking along these lines for more than three years, but that's the first time I've made it public. I'm very rarely inclined to trash such major efforts, but the jury's back, and really has been for a while. Bluetooth is toast, finished, over. Stick a fork in it. It's done.

I take no pleasure in the above. I first saw Bluetooth in 1997, when it was called MC Link. It was cool: RF IrDA. Self-organizing mesh networking. Low cost. Universal acceptance. Cheap. But while the Bluetooth community was merrily building the vision (and, occasionally, products), the rest of the world was progressing with significantly greater effectiveness. 802.11 got cheap, too, and much faster. Bluetooth access points were superseded by Wi-Fi rollouts, now moving toward ubiquity in major population centers. Cellular handsets-the natural homeland of Bluetooth-will soon be hosting 802.11 radios.

Bluetooth proponents continue to remind me that millions of Bluetooth chips roll off the lines every month. Quite true. Most go into headsets; some go into keyboards and mouses. But why use a radio that can interfere with 802.11b and g for such purposes? And what's wrong with a wired headset, which is cheaper, better-sounding, lighter and more reliable-and without the silly blinking LED? Gratuitous Bluetooth? You bet.

To be fair, I also want to point out that the Bluetooth applications stack is a great piece of work, and I expect it to find a home in many wireless (and even wired) LANs. Bluetooth thus won't be a total loss-but as a PHY for data, it will be. It's too slow. Overpromised. Underdelivered.

The final nail in the Bluetooth coffin should have been the approval of the 802.15.3a PHY last month in Singapore. It didn't happen, perhaps because diminished corporate travel budgets made it tough for so many to attend this meeting. But we're really close to a WPAN standard that, if nothing else, at least has leading-edge throughput. And I believe that UWB is going to play a big role in consumer electronics and maybe even wireless personal-area networks.

In a few short years, many will look back on Bluetooth as a lesson on marketing gone awry. Most will still wonder what all the fuss was all about. Regardless, it's now time to move on.

Craig J. Mathias is principal of Farpoint Group (Ashland, Mass.).










The views and opinions expressed in this column are strictly those of the author and should not be taken as an editorial position of EE Times or any of its other editors, publications or Web sites.


  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Ready to take that job and shove it?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
10 Search Engines You Don't Know About
Go beyond Google and get vertical. These specialized search sites will help you find the business information you need -- fast.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.


All White Papers »   

 

FEATURED TOPIC



ADDITIONAL TOPICS












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features



All materials on this site Copyright © 2008 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Your California Privacy Rights | Terms of Service | About