United Business Media EE Times


Search

HOMEMARKET INTELLIGENCE UNITFORUMSDESIGNNEW PRODUCTSCAREERSBLOGSCONTACTEVENTSSIGN UP!RSSMost Popular contentTrusted Sources

 


Home sweet heartache
Print this article Email this article Reprints RSS Digital Edition

EE Times


Loring WirbelOn Jan. 7, just about the time I was talking to Conexant chief executive Dwight Decker about how ruthless and unprofitable the consumer PC market was, Cisco Systems Inc. was making its premiere appearance at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, launching a consumer line of business under Robba Benjamin, part of a New World network effort involving more than 30 partners.

Now, it's easy to see why a company Cisco's size would like to have a consumer-branding campaign as successful as "Intel Inside." But Cisco had better look again at the woes of specialty real-time OS vendors like Wink and Microware, or examine the uphill battle Echelon has faced getting Lonworks accepted in the home, before it assumes the Cisco Internetwork Operating System (IOS) will be a household name any time soon.

The strategy here is unclear. If voice over Internet Protocol is the primary aim, there are simpler ways of implementing it than a Cisco IP stack. If embedded IOS routing for a set-top box or residential gateway is the goal, Cisco had better understand how the home will bend the phrase "least-cost routing." A representative of the Consumer's Union told National Public Radio a couple of weeks ago that the "dirty little secret" of the home market is that all consumers, even bandwidth hogs, will use the simplest and cheapest access methods available, which means if a home net exists at all, it will have a Layer 2 bridge at its center.

This message bears repeating for all the hardware proponents of Home PNA, Home RF, Bluetooth and the other home-networking schemes vying for market acceptance. At the joint IEEE/ETSI meeting on radio nets earlier this month in Orlando, Fla., members were united in their aggravation with ad hoc coalitions for home networking. The coalitions say they're not working with standards bodies because a home net needs to be developed very quickly. Why? So components can be commoditized before their time?

Home markets always take a long time to develop and demand instant bargain pricing. Network component vendors price-bomb their wares to create a market, leading to instant dissolution of margins before volumes become high. Is Cisco sure it wants to play here? Is anyone?

Last week, on the eve of ComNet, Lucent Technologies held a function in New York to tout yet another home-network initiative. I'm glad I'll be among carriers and the OEMs who serve them at the ComNet show this week, so I don't have to think about the unforgiving and unpleasant market for home networking.





The views and opinions expressed in this column are strictly those of the author and should not be taken as an editorial position of EE Times or any of its other editors, publications or Web sites.


  Free Subscription to EE Times
First Name Last Name
Company Name Title
Email address
  Click here for your Free Subscription to EETimes Europe
 
CAREER CENTER
Looking for a new job?
SEARCH JOBS
SPONSOR

RECENT JOB POSTINGS
CAREER NEWS
SRC Expands R&D Centers
The Semiconductor Research Corp has added a new center to its university R&D efforts.

For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.


All White Papers »   

 
Education and
Learning


Learn Now:












Home | About | Editorial Calendar | Feedback | Subscriptions | Newsletter | Media Kit | Contact | Reprints|  RSS|   Digital|  Mobile
Network Websites
International
Network Features




All materials on this site Copyright © 2009 TechInsights, a Division of United Business Media LLC All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Service | About