Advertisement
News
EEtimes
News the global electronics community can trust
eetimes.com
power electronics news
The trusted news source for power-conscious design engineers
powerelectronicsnews.com
EPSNews
News for Electronics Purchasing and the Supply Chain
epsnews.com
elektroda
The can't-miss forum engineers and hobbyists
elektroda.pl
eetimes eu
News, technologies, and trends in the electronics industry
eetimes.eu
Products
Electronics Products
Product news that empowers design decisions
electronicproducts.com
Datasheets.com
Design engineer' search engine for electronic components
datasheets.com
eem
The electronic components resource for engineers and purchasers
eem.com
Design
embedded.com
The design site for hardware software, and firmware engineers
embedded.com
Elector Schematics
Where makers and hobbyists share projects
electroschematics.com
edn Network
The design site for electronics engineers and engineering managers
edn.com
electronic tutorials
The learning center for future and novice engineers
electronics-tutorials.ws
TechOnline
The educational resource for the global engineering community
techonline.com
Tools
eeweb.com
Where electronics engineers discover the latest toolsThe design site for hardware software, and firmware engineers
eeweb.com
Part Sim
Circuit simulation made easy
partsim.com
schematics.com
Brings you all the tools to tackle projects big and small - combining real-world components with online collaboration
schematics.com
PCB Web
Hardware design made easy
pcbweb.com
schematics.io
A free online environment where users can create, edit, and share electrical schematics, or convert between popular file formats like Eagle, Altium, and OrCAD.
schematics.io
Product Advisor
Find the IoT board you’ve been searching for using this interactive solution space to help you visualize the product selection process and showcase important trade-off decisions.
transim.com/iot
Transim Engage
Transform your product pages with embeddable schematic, simulation, and 3D content modules while providing interactive user experiences for your customers.
transim.com/Products/Engage
About
AspenCore
A worldwide innovation hub servicing component manufacturers and distributors with unique marketing solutions
aspencore.com
Silicon Expert
SiliconExpert provides engineers with the data and insight they need to remove risk from the supply chain.
siliconexpert.com
Transim
Transim powers many of the tools engineers use every day on manufacturers' websites and can develop solutions for any company.
transim.com

Design 2.0: A New Moore’s Law

By   12.08.2014 0

Hackathons, accelerators, incubators, and crowdfunding sources are some of its key elements. Its motivation is to enable anyone with a good idea to make more innovation happen faster.

It has a sort of parallel universe in the Maker movement that’s geared more for fun than for profit. Similar sets of tech-savvy geeks inhabit both worlds, dipping into a communal pool of tools such as open source software and low-cost boards — Arduino, Raspberry Pi, flavor of the month.

At a time when corporate design methodologies are exhibiting an advanced sclerosis of documented best practices, Design 2.0 is the Nike of a new generation, saying, “Just do it.”

For example, I know a veteran microprocessor designer who left Intel not long ago, complaining that it takes a decade to get from a good idea to a shipping SoC. By contrast, Thomas Sohmers, a high school dropout, aims to create a chip next year that will beat the pants off anything in GFlops/Watt. He was inspired in part by Andreas Olofsson, who shipped multiple versions of his Epiphany chips in less than five years on less than $5 million in funding.

The Web 2.0 crowd helped spawn Design 2.0. The first hackathon I ever attended was at a Facebook event, where I heard its motto, “Move fast and break things.”

Hackathons make sense for folks such as Facebook and Google. They run vast server farms where you can plant a new software program and — with some luck and considerable tweaking — quickly wind up with a bumper crop of profitable web services.

Facebook applied this design philosophy to its data center hardware with its Open Compute Project, disrupting the staid markets for servers and switches. The GoogleX lab did the same for hardware projects from smartglasses to driverless cars.

We’ve written stories on all these things, but there’s much more to be told. It’s early days for Design 2.0. You have many still-evolving stories we need to hear.

  • In some ways, 2014 was the year of the hackathon. I’d like to hear about ones you attended or hosted. What worked, and what didn’t?
  • Accelerators/incubators are growing up like weeds from San Francisco to Shenzhen and Boston. Which one did you choose to work with, why, and what was your experience?
  • What have you learned trying to crowdfund a project on Indiegogo or Kickstarter? What would you do differently?

I’m hoping to hear from the full spectrum of engineers, from twenty-somethings getting their first work experiences to veteran corporate R&D chiefs trying something new.

Design 2.0 is clearly happening. Tell us where it’s taking you.

— Rick Merritt, Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, EE Times Circle me on Google+

Related posts:

0 comments
Post Comment
dcblaza   2014-12-08 15:17:47

Rick,  I think you are right about Design 2.0,  just look at Kickstarter tech projects,  they have now funded over 2,000 tech projects to the tune of $220m and 94 of those companies have gone on to raise over $500m in VC funding (source Crunchbase).  Design 2.0 is happening because of inexpensive highly integrated hardware (mainly ARM based), open source software, Smartphone ubiquity and crowdfunding.  Its not one single trend but the combination of these coming together thats the rocket fuel.  IoT is going to be real!

krisi   2014-12-08 16:20:31

This might be true for the after-ASIC era...if you base your design on existing IP core, usually ARM and throw in some FPGA blocks we might start seeing design acceleration...the old paradigm of desiging your ASIC might be dead, Andreas might be an exception, there will be very few like him

alex_m1   2014-12-08 16:44:03

@krisi, not sure i agree that adding fpga's is the new way,becausde it takes lots of resources. It might make sense if you're designing a 28nm/20nm chip - but who does that except of the rare few who build the next processor ? For the others , i think stuff like easic's 28nm gate-array (which comes maybe to 2-3x of asic) is a more realistic scenario, or something like 65nm.

As for tools - chisel(a hardware language) is the secret sauce behind the design  of the highly efficient microprocessor. It's(maybe with some other tools) supposdely can let you describe the behaviour of an floating point ALU at a very high level, it generates many variations until it finds the optimal design. I think it's based on research from here: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6545888&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6545888

krisi   2014-12-08 16:51:26

well, if you use very advanced FPGA you are indirectly riding a scaling horse (as Altera and Xilinx follow Moore's law as fast as they can)...but you want to want to design your own very advanced ASIC you need at least $10M...that is a lot of crowdsourcing!

Matthieu Wipliez   2014-12-08 17:03:47

About FPGAs, it's just that for far too long they have just remained chips with a huge potential but that virtually nobody knows how to use, or even wants to (compared to CPUs, GPUs, many-cores or even DSPs). Of course the remaining obstacle for FPGAs to become mainstream and be part of this trend is to make them easy to program by everybody, not just by hardware designers and electrical engineers, but by coders too!

The thing is that if you give coders the possibility to design hardware easily, combined with the opportunities of the IoT (and the needs for low-power custom-made chips), you might just disrupt the usual ASIC value chain... and give a lot of small companies the occasion to tape out ASICs on older nodes much more easily and for far cheaper than today.

Now *this* would really be "*hardware* design 2.0"! Hopefully we can lead hackers and coders this way! (and let hardware designers design ASICs the old-fashioned way ^^)

krisi   2014-12-08 17:08:05

I think this is bound to happen Matthiew...but it will be all these ASIC people who connect transistors now that will move to program FPGAs...I don't see software coders learning to deal with hardware directly...but it is just me (I am a hardware guy at heart)

rick merritt   2014-12-08 17:08:49

Before we take a looooong detour on the subject of FPGAs, let me reiterate I'd like to hear your Design 2.0 stories working with hackathons, accelerators/incubators, crowd-funding sources and the like .

Thanks in advance for any stories from the field!

alex_m1   2014-12-08 17:15:28

Toshiba has a structures asic called FFSA 40nm which is equivalent to a 28nm fpga, but about half the unit cost and with NRE of $400K at volumes of 10K/yr*5 years, and they claim better performance and power. i would put their 28nm FFSA nre at $500K-$600K. The nre is is quite reasonable , even for a kickstarter(not that i ever seen a kickstarter for something with an fpga/asic, except bitcoin).

krisi   2014-12-08 17:31:13

Sure, gate arrays have their place...half of the way between FPGA and ASIC...you just customize the metal layers...they used to be very popular when I was getting my education (very long tine ago ;-)...which probably explains why Toshiba calls them now Fit Fast Structured Arrays (FFSA), somebody in Toshiba's marketing organization was compelled to justify their paycheck and coined a new term...I doubt that the name change did much to the sales level which I am guessing are much lower than for Xilinx

krisi   2014-12-08 17:37:07

Apologies Rick for dragging your story in a different direction...I stay in touch with number of incubators and accelerators but none of them do what you describe...most work on a new app for smartphones...hardly design 2.0 concept...I am curious to hear what other will report here

rick merritt   2014-12-09 11:25:16

@KrisI: No probs.

There are several incubators focusing on hardware (Highway 1, Bolt, Lemnos Labs, Dragon, etc). I am interested to know more about them, too!

docdivakar   2014-12-10 11:50:59

@Kris: you do have a point on mobile apps stealing the show and I agree Design 2.0 will not be mostly that. In almost all of the Silicon Valley incubators and workspace sharing hubs, you will find a combination of hardware and software incubations. There are more mobile apps startups largely because the barrier and cost to entry is lower than those of hardware and technology startups.

And we are not addressing biotech and medical devices / apps incubation in this discussion at all. These are increasingly overlapping with the conventional electronics / IT/ software startups these days. And the big biotech / medical devices companies are taking notice, as we saw recently Janssen Labs being acquired by Johnson & Johnson.

MP Divakar

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.