News
EEtimes
News the global electronics community can trust
eetimes.com
power electronics news
The trusted news source for power-conscious design engineers
powerelectronicsnews.com
ebn
Supply chain news for the electronics industry
ebnonline.com
elektroda
The can't-miss forum engineers and hobbyists
elektroda.pl
Products
Electronics Products
Product news that empowers design decisions
electronicproducts.com
Datasheets.com
Design engineer' search engine for electronic components
datasheets.com
eem
The electronic components resource for engineers and purchasers
eem.com
Design
embedded.com
The design site for hardware software, and firmware engineers
embedded.com
Elector Schematics
Where makers and hobbyists share projects
electroschematics.com
edn Network
The design site for electronics engineers and engineering managers
edn.com
electronic tutorials
The learning center for future and novice engineers
electronics-tutorials.ws
TechOnline
The educational resource for the global engineering community
techonline.com
Tools
eeweb.com
Where electronics engineers discover the latest toolsThe design site for hardware software, and firmware engineers
eeweb.com
Part Sim
Circuit simulation made easy
partsim.com
schematics.com
Brings you all the tools to tackle projects big and small - combining real-world components with online collaboration
schematics.com
PCB Web
Hardware design made easy
pcbweb.com
schematics.io
A free online environment where users can create, edit, and share electrical schematics, or convert between popular file formats like Eagle, Altium, and OrCAD.
schematics.io
Product Advisor
Find the IoT board you’ve been searching for using this interactive solution space to help you visualize the product selection process and showcase important trade-off decisions.
transim.com/iot
Transim Engage
Transform your product pages with embeddable schematic, simulation, and 3D content modules while providing interactive user experiences for your customers.
transim.com/Products/Engage
About
AspenCore
A worldwide innovation hub servicing component manufacturers and distributors with unique marketing solutions
aspencore.com
Silicon Expert
SiliconExpert provides engineers with the data and insight they need to remove risk from the supply chain.
siliconexpert.com
Transim
Transim powers many of the tools engineers use every day on manufacturers' websites and can develop solutions for any company.
transim.com

Intel CEO Finds the Shoe Fit, After All

By   08.01.2019 4

The job is among the most prestigious in the semiconductor industry, and it doesn’t open up all that often. And Bob Swan was pretty sure that he didn’t want it.

It was June 2018. Brian Krzanich had just resigned in disgrace after five years as Intel’s CEO, following revelations of an extramarital affair with a subordinate. The news gripped the company, from its employee base all the way up to the boardroom and beyond, sending shockwaves through the financial community, Silicon Valley, and the broader semiconductor industry.

In the throes of crisis, Intel’s board turned to Swan, who had joined Intel as chief financial officer in October of 2016. Swan was a veteran businessman with more than two decades of experience in executive management, but his exposure to the chip industry was somewhat indirect, having served on the board of directors of semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials for seven years.


Recommended
Swan’s Mission: Turn Around Battleship Intel


At the very least, those were solid qualifications for an interim CEO, someone who could hold the reins while Intel’s board (with the help of an executive search firm) searched for a new permanent CEO. Swan recognized the importance of giving the board the time that it needed to do a thorough search and was willing to step into the breach and lead the company on a temporary basis, and so he agreed to do that. But he wasn't interested in the job.

“The reason I wasn’t interested is because I loved my day job,” said Swan in an interview with EE Times. “I said I wasn’t interested and that my primary focus would be with the somewhat abrupt exit of my predecessor to pull the team together, focus on the business, and give the board the time to do a thorough search for what I considered the best open job in the world. And that was my focus.”

No one anticipated that the search for a permanent CEO would last more than six months.

What happened between June 2018 and January 31, 2019, when Swan agreed to drop the “interim” affixed to the title? Why did Swan change his mind?

He admits that it sounds a little bit corny, but Swan maintains that he had fallen in love with Intel during his time at CFO. Upon taking the reins on an interim basis, his respect and admiration for the company grew. He had the opportunity to see firsthand how important Intel was to the success of its customers. Meanwhile, he said, he and the rest of Intel’s executive leadership gelled as a team.

Acting AG Whitaker

Swan (right) talks with engineers at Intel’s Oregon fab.

“During that six- or seven-month timeframe, I think my peers and I, we all kind of rallied around each other,” Swan said. “And I think collectively, during that time, we built a really strong bond.”

Like a lot of CEOs, Swan believes that running a company is really a collective effort. The person in the corner office may garner the lion’s share of the headlines, but ultimately, the big decisions are rarely, if ever, made by a single figure. “Anybody going into a CEO job is prepared on several fronts and maybe not prepared on others. The question is whether you have the people around you that complement your skills such that one plus one plus one equals something much greater than three. I’m surrounded by good people, first and foremost, and they view it as a team sport. And they have very complementary skills to what I have with a common thread of maybe intellectual curiosity.”

Editor’s note:

This is an installment in a series of EE Times articles that profile the CEOs and other top executives who lead many of the semiconductor industry’s most important companies. These stories will focus on what makes the leaders of the industry tick and what initially drew them to electronics.

Swan’s experience prior to joining Intel in 2016 included 15 years at General Electric in various finance roles. He later served in CFO roles at a number of tech firms, including Electronic Data Systems, TRW, Webvan (where he was also briefly the CEO), Northrop Grumman, HP Enterprise Services, and eBay, where he held the role for nine years.

In 2015, Swan became an operating partner at a growth equity firm. He might have stayed there indefinitely, but in 2016, he was lured back into the CFO role at what he says is one of only a handful of companies that he would have considered joining — Intel.


Recommended
#IntelToo?


Ironically, it was Krzanich who convinced Swan to take the job. About 10 minutes into his first-ever meeting with Krzanich, over dinner, Swan felt the need to be clear with Krzanich that despite his time on the board at Applied Materials, he wasn’t an expert on the semiconductor industry and didn’t consider himself an expert on Intel by any stretch.

“And Brian had the perfect answer,” Swan said. “He said, ‘I’ve been in this company for 30-some-odd years. I know this company extremely well. I know this industry extremely well. And the team around me has been with me for almost as long. What we need is not to know more about our company and the industry. We need to have additional thoughts and complementary capabilities from somebody who’s been in different experiences, with a proven track record every step along the way, that can get us to think a little bit differently about the opportunity set.’”

Swan said that just being asked to consider the CFO role at Intel was humbling but that he wasn’t going to take the job unless he felt from his vantage point and the Intel leadership vantage point that his addition would be valuable to the team. He felt very early on that he meshed well with Krzanich and the rest of the leadership team. “They weren’t looking to me to be something I’m not.”

Among the things that Swan admired about Intel from afar long before joining the company are Intel’s long and distinguished history and the company’s ability to reinvent itself several times along the way. And while he declined to characterize the transformation currently underway at Intel as its most important reinvention, it’s clear that Swan is leading the company through another transitional moment.

Intel has for several years been undergoing a metamorphosis from a supplier almost purely of microprocessors mostly for PCs to what it calls a “data-centric” company with a broader focus — including IoT, automotive, and data centers. This has and will continue to pit Intel head to head against a broader set of semiconductor players. But it also gives Intel a much larger addressable market.

Though this evolution has included its share of missteps along the way, it has largely been successful. Intel has gone from deriving more than 70% of its revenue from PC processors at the beginning of this decade to just about a 50/50 split between its “PC-centric” and “data-centric” businesses today (53% to 47% in favor of PC-centric during the second quarter). In the years to come, Swan said, Intel expects to continue growing its data-centric business to eventually make up 70% of the company’s revenue as PC sales decline.

As Swan sees it, the evolution of Intel gives the company a lot more room to spread its wings and grow. In the age of perpetual PC shipment declines, it has gone from deriving 70% of its revenue from a declining business in which it had a dominant market share position to creating new products for emerging markets in which, in some cases, it has nowhere to go but up.

“We no longer see the world where we have 90% of the market with nowhere to go,” he said. “The way we look at it now, we have more like 30% of the market, where the prospects for growth are endless.”

To further its quest, Intel has both invested heavily in R&D and made a string of acquisitions.

“We’ve made organic investments and inorganic investments to expand the role we can play in the success of our customers,” Swan said. “And we have leading positions in the key technology inflections of 5G, AI, and autonomous driving. It’s awesome. It’s not a bad hand. But now, our challenge is to play that hand the best that we possibly can.”

Swan is just the seventh CEO in Intel’s 50-year history, and he is not the first non-engineer to lead the company. That distinction goes to Paul Otellini, Intel’s chief executive from 2005 to 2013.


Recommended
Synopsys’s Frontman Still Hitting the Right Notes


Nevertheless, anytime a non-engineer gets promoted to lead a semiconductor company — especially one of the most prestigious semiconductor companies — it draws a certain amount of scrutiny. Engineers, after all, often seem to trust only engineers.

Swan doesn’t spend a lot of time fretting about his lack of a technical background. Philosophically, he said that he believes the role of a CEO is to inspire greatness in the people around him or her but to be clear-eyed about their own strengths and weaknesses and surround themselves with good people that have the knowledge and experience that they may lack.

Acting AG Whitaker

Swan outside Intel’s headquarters in Santa Clara

“We’ve got about 70,000 engineers,” he said. “I don’t need to be the best engineer. We’ve got the best engineers in the world. Having 70,001 might not be what the company needs.”

For Swan, a finance guy by trade leading the world’s biggest chipmaker, that has meant surrounding himself by great technical people. “My challenge is to learn from the brilliant engineers that I’m surrounded by. Also, I think inquisition through a different lens sometimes can bring something new to the table rather than maybe the same way of thinking about a problem. Naiveté can be extremely helpful in the quest for greatness.”

4 comments
Post Comment
Evariste   2019-08-02 12:58:48

Why did he change his mind?  Well, I imagine the salary is non-negligible.  It could have influenced his decision.

In running a large company, a CFO-level-knowledge of finance is a good thing.  However, I believe it's a bad sign when a tech company like Intel appoints a non-engineer CEO.  The argument that one can surround oneself with knowledgeable people sounds facile.  

bolaji.ojo   2019-08-08 05:32:16

What the board of director looks for in selecting a CEO is a set of skills. I'm not sure an engineer is a natural better leader for a technology company than anyone else with a fundamental understanding of the business. Undoubtedly, for Intel, an engineer would seem a better fit.

However, more important than a technical degree would be having a leader with a solid vision and the ability to select the right lieutenants. Apple CEO Cook has a supply chain background, founder Steve Jobs was not an engineer, and Warren Buffet does not have a degree in all the multiple segments Berkshire Hathaway plays in today. In time, we'd see if the Board of directors at Intel made the right choice.

Evariste   2019-08-08 16:07:46

The reason I say the argument sounds facile is that it would mean anyone could run anything, as long as they have "vision" and select the right underlings.  But that's not really the case.  When a tech company appoints a non-engineer CEO, it's a sign of it going astray, losing its soul.  The engineer workforce does not respect such a CEO much, either.

Warren Buffet doesn't oversee high-tech companies, so he isn't a good counterexample.  The chief of Dairy Queen needn't be a cognoscente of ice cream.  Steve Jobs wasn't a hard-core engineer, but his company's inception was dependent upon Woz, who was (although he lacked a degree at the time).  And Jobs is a bit of an exception in that he was very product-focused.  He did not delegate important decisions about product design.  That is not the case in many firms.  I doubt the CEO of GM ever took a test drive in a Pontiak Aztek.  He should have.  This new guy at Intel might not even know the basics of microprocessor architecture.  You might say he doesn't need to, but I don't believe it.  He must delegate all design decisions.  He doesn't even know enough to know if he's delegating to the proper lieutenants.  

spike_johan   2019-08-09 11:05:50

Both Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore understood the (IC) business because they helped create the business. They were both experts in the physics of semiconductors. The finance part of the business, they learned as Intel grew. 

I don't think that process works in reverse. An expert in business - however much an expert - can't presume to see the future of an industry to which they have no inherent expertise.

Mr. Swan's decisions will all ultimately be finance decisions. Sadly, because he doesn't even know what he doesn't know.

PS - Who Intel really needed as CEO was a Lisa Su. Certainly not another beancounter.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.