REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
docdivakar
User Rank
Author
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
docdivakar   9/21/2010 5:56:08 PM
NO RATINGS
The wait is going to be longer for using EUV at 16nm. At Nikon's LithoVision San Jose this year, Nikon made announcements that EUV's availability at 16nm (they missed for 22nm!) is pushed to dates 2012 or later. I like Mr. Sawicki's take on 3D. Sure enough, the most optimum and reliable 3D stacked system is the one that is homogeneous. But this is years away from productization. There needs to be a sea change of capabilities and features implemented in the current 2D (or 2.5D) EDA tools. Circuit simulators need to work side by side with field simulators (emag, thermal & stress) in a practical way (read: shouldn't take several days to simulate!) to make the design process manageable. Heterogeneous stacks on the other hand are seeing a good pace of development. There are several MPW's on the way that help researchers and product developers test their designs. The design challenge here using existing EDA tools is by no means a lesser challenge than the homogeneous stacks. Dr. MP Divakar

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
resistion   8/26/2010 6:43:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Wonder if Mentor implemented multiple patterning at 16 nm.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
krisi   8/25/2010 2:08:19 PM
NO RATINGS
16nm? Sounds like very early. First is not always better for business in this case...plus how many companies can really do 16nm silicon processing? 3? 5? so any EDA development is really custom for a particular foundry considering large difference between them, at least initially until some equipment standardization happens...Kris

FChen
User Rank
Author
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
FChen   8/24/2010 4:12:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Are they going to cross-license with Tela Innovations?

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Author
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
double-o-nothing   8/24/2010 2:45:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Need to spread your net wide below 22 nm. Even 3-D is not a for sure thing. Trend extrapolation has its limit, that limit is about now. Double or even multiple patterning is the most natural choice for now, even if pushing Moore's law more slowly than before.

goafrit
User Rank
Author
re: Mentor moves tools toward 16-nanometer
goafrit   8/24/2010 1:07:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Let me congratulate Mentor Graphics. However, going down may not really be great business. In this race of nanometer devices, not being an early adopter could pay off better.



Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.