REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
RandomJitter
User Rank
Author
re: DesignCon panelists spar over PDKs
RandomJitter   2/7/2011 6:09:12 PM
NO RATINGS
IMHO, iPL is a step toward moving the customer up from the bottom of the EDA pile.

DataMuncher
User Rank
Author
re: DesignCon panelists spar over PDKs
DataMuncher   2/7/2011 5:10:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Which is easier depends on a lot of things but basically IMHO SKILL pcells are easier if: = You are dealing in legacy technology - 180nm and above = You have tons of legacy SKILL infrastructure and existing devices = You have a CAD team of crusty SKILL coders who are change-adverse = Cadence is willing to develop them for you for free (they weren't for our company) pyCells are easier if: = You are moving to a 40nm and below technology - some effects are nigh impossible to code in SKILL = Your CAD team wants to learn a modern, useful langauge = You don't have legacy devices or are willing to restart - we did this when we moved to OA. It was worthwhile giving up all the .cdb based cruft. Comment - This all assumes you are using CiraNova's free PyCell studio which really makes doing pyCells easy and interactive.

yalanand
User Rank
Author
re: DesignCon panelists spar over PDKs
yalanand   2/5/2011 7:41:18 PM
NO RATINGS
No doubt, Cadence is scared to join iPDK, because PDK is bread and butter biz of CADENCE. and it would be foolish of them to join iPDK. By the as a end user which one is easy to use PCELL from SKILL or PyCell?

mark.lapedus
User Rank
Author
re: DesignCon panelists spar over PDKs
mark.lapedus   2/5/2011 3:20:55 AM
NO RATINGS
Based on what I've seen in the PDK world, the customer comes last in the EDA biz. Is that right or wrong?

DataMuncher
User Rank
Author
re: DesignCon panelists spar over PDKs
DataMuncher   2/5/2011 2:02:45 AM
NO RATINGS
It's sad to see Cadence backing into the proprietary SKILL language corner when OpenAccess, the database they pioneered, easily interfaces to more capable open languages like python and tcl for PDK development. TSMC and others have proved that a single open PDK can serve the industry and even work in Virtuoso. At least they were honest four years ago when people were asking them to open up PDKs. http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4069823/Sparks-fly-at-EDA-troublemakers-panel?pageNumber=1 "That's the last closed citadel in the EDA world for interoperability." "Bluntly, that's not going to happen," Vucurevich replied. "We're not going to open from a competitive point of view and say here's a free ride for coming in and trying to take over accounts."



Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.