REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>
resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:27:08 PM
NO RATINGS
The US may attract but not necessarily retain.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 3:22:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Nothing requiring clearance at universities. Defense firms on the other hand...

tideblue
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:31:42 AM
NO RATINGS
OK ok,let's say all you said is true. Then I am begging our great world-peace-keeper uncle Sam to deliver great democracy to this evil country. Then what?why do not they take China like Iraq. It is 100 times more evil

tideblue
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
tideblue   6/12/2012 11:20:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Looks like you really know china history.But you are very wrong. Even during the cultural revolution, chinese GDP doubled in that 10 years. (please do some googling). Many of your so called facts are wrong.I do want to comments on all of them. So please, if you try to understand china, do it like a real engineer. Do not use those second-hand biased facts.Be careful with the media, since most of them are trying to brainwash you guys.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
resistion   6/12/2012 4:15:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Key concern seems to be do markets outside China matter? Hopefully they do, otherwise the frustration sensed here can only rise..

Paul911
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Paul911   6/12/2012 12:48:55 AM
NO RATINGS
good point from private1234567890...

private1234567890
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Country B --------- The country's trade policy has literally been the most protectionist in the world for the last few decades, with an average industrial tariff rate at 40-55%. The majority of the population cannot vote, and vote-buying and electoral fraud are widespread. Corruption is rampant, with the political parties selling government jobs to their financial bankers. The country has never recruited a single civil servant through an open,competitive process. Its public finances are precarious, with records of government loan defaults that worry foreign investors. Especially in the banking sector, foreigners are prohibited from becoming directos while foreign shareholders cannot even exercise their voting rights unless they are resident in the country. It does not have a competition law, permitting cartels and other forms of monopoly to grow unchecked. Its protection of intellectual property rights is patchy, particularly marred by its refusal to protect foreigner's copyrights. Country A is China today. Country B is the USA, around 1880, when it was somewhat poorer than today's China. http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you

private1234567890
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
private1234567890   6/11/2012 6:44:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Two basket cases... http://tinyurl.com/23-things-they-dont-tell-you Both these countries below are up to their necks in heavy protectionism, discrimination against foreign investors, weak protection of property rights, monopolies, lack of democracy, corruption, lack of meritocracy, and so on. You would think that they are both headed for developmental disasters. But think again. Country A --------- Until a decade ago, the country was highly protectionist, with an average industrial tariff rate well above 30%. Despite the recent tariff reduction, important visible and invisible trade restrictions remain. The country has heavy restrictions on cross-border flows of capital, a state-owned and highly regulated banking sector, and numerous restrictions on foreign ownership of financial assets. Foreign firms producing in the country complain that they are discriminated against through differential taxes and regulations by local governments. The country has no elections and is riddled with corruption. It has opaque and complicated property rights. In particular, its protection of intellectual property rights is weak, making it the pirate capital of the world. The country has a large number of state-owned enterprises, many of which make large losses but are propped up by subsidies and government-granted monopoly rights.

Chao.Shen
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
Chao.Shen   6/11/2012 5:40:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said. If you can't stop it, stand up and compete with it.

moloned
User Rank
Author
re: Four reasons why its 'game over' for foreign chip firms in China
moloned   6/11/2012 4:30:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Wrong. Services will eventually follow the money back to China. Governments should be working on levelling the playing field by legislation and taxation , something they have signally failed to do. Look at the raspberry pi debacle where even though the AP was designed by Broadcom in the UK, tax rules meant that the raspi boards were cheaper to build in China. Stoopid is as stoopid does!

<<   <   Page 5 / 18   >   >>


Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.