REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
rf_austin
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
rf_austin   9/7/2012 2:08:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Okay... indeed, they have demonstrated 10ns switching in 90nm technology. I went back to a Berkeley MEMS paper presented at ISSCC 2010 titled "Prospects for MEM Logic Switch Technology" by Tsu-Jae King Liu, et. al. A very interesting and well written paper. Please contemplate the implications of the following statement pulled from the cited paper. "Ideally, relay endurance should exceed ~3×10^14 cycles, e.g. so that a relay- based microcontroller for embedded sensor applications could operate reliably for 10 years at 100 MHz clock frequency and 0.01 average transition probability." The clock restrictions implied in that statement are significant. Since this is an emerging technology, perhaps they will find a chemistry that enables higher reliability, which translates into greater reliability and longer life or significantly higher transition probability. Higher clock rate... perhaps. I have built MEMS switches for RF applications and I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but it also makes me well aware of fundamental physics. i hope they prove me wrong and will gladly drink to their success.

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
krisi   9/6/2012 2:26:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting discussion, we had very interesting talks on this topic at emerging technologies symposiums (www.cmoset.com)...mechanical devices look slow but at nanoscale they can be actually pretty fast, ns or so...they also look large but again at nanosacel they can be quite small so you can put fair amount of them on IC...having said that there is no way they can replace MOSFETs, they can only add value by providing extra functionality like lower leakage switches...Kris

any1
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
any1   9/5/2012 9:26:11 PM
NO RATINGS
I have seen some simple devices using cantilevered carbon nanotubes. I can see carbon nanotube enabled switches scaling much smaller than 3 by 3 microns.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Peter Clarke   9/5/2012 5:28:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Dont forget that Cavendish Kinetics and others have been working on memories based on this approach for years.

Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Jayna Sheats   9/5/2012 5:20:18 PM
NO RATINGS
This is actually not true; the UC Berkeley group has already demonstrated ns response times and sub-micron features. The technology promises to scale well. The issues are really system-level: device advantages often get lost when the constraints of an entire system are considered.

icdsn
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
icdsn   9/5/2012 3:33:23 PM
NO RATINGS
3x3um cell size, logic will be $$$

rf_austin
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
rf_austin   9/5/2012 3:30:25 PM
NO RATINGS
No matter how small you make a mems switch, the switching speed is still in kHz or at best barely reaching MHz. Although it is small, there is still inertia associated with the metal that is being moved. For those applications that are okay with kHz clock rates but almost no power consumption and extraordinarily radiation hard, this could be what you are waiting for.

TFCSD
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
TFCSD   9/5/2012 4:08:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Cool, I use to work on IBM wire logic relays on their unit record machines in the 80's. Just give me a small enough contact file and lots of contact cleaner.

vipul982
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
vipul982   9/5/2012 3:52:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I can't imagine we are headed towards these type of technologies. I doubt that using mechanical compponents would create a hell of noise in circuits, lot of research must be done.

PaDesigner
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
PaDesigner   9/4/2012 10:31:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Swedish inst. and few others have related works on this.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
Tim R Johnson
 
ewertz
 
antedeluvian
 
ewertz
 
perl_geek
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
perl_geek
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Most Recent Messages
11/19/2017
3:31:42 PM
Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.