REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Ron Neale
User Rank
Author
re: Do annular electrodes present a scalable PCM solution? - Part 2
Ron Neale   5/20/2013 3:51:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Resistion I think it is always possible to affix any or value definition you wish to hp (usually defined as half distance between minimum features). The self assembly (S-A) process) must be considered as independent of lithography. The distance between the S-A oxide discs will be defined by the chemical-oxidation process and added as a sub-lithographic overlay onto the best conventional lithographic process; in my example 20nm lithography. The S K Hynix 1Gb PCM that I covered in one of my earlier EETimes PCM papers was an example of a 42nm minimum feature size resulting in a 2F^2 cell with an hp of 42nm. Again, in Part 2 above my “d” was the diameter of the oxide discs and that has nothing to do with lithography.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Do annular electrodes present a scalable PCM solution? - Part 2
resistion   5/20/2013 1:36:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe you can say hp is 20 nm and the cell is 4*hp^2, but if hp is 4x diameter, the cell is 4*16*d^2 or 64d^2. Some schools use hp as F some use d as F. Although hp is more in tune with lithographic requirements, d is more in tune with actual process requirements.

Ron Neale
User Rank
Author
re: Do annular electrodes present a scalable PCM solution? - Part 2
Ron Neale   5/20/2013 8:53:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Resistion- Perhaps you can share with us the basis of your conclusion. In my figure 9 above, consider the example of 5nm oxide discs (your nano particles) and a fill factor of 50% for a 20 x 20nm (I.e F =20nm) aperture just over 10 discs are required. Even if you square-packed the discs in the same 20 x 20nm aperture so they were all touching each other a simple calculation shows 16 discs would be required. The nano particles (discs) are sub-lithographic features so the number of them and the diameter should be independent of the lithographic feature size F. Assuming you are using F in the conventional manner as minimum lithographic feature size in my square aperture example the cell size will be dependent on the lithographic feature size as 4F^2. The main questions that have to be answered for self-assembly (S-A) is can the discs be produced with diameters of less than 5nm and more importantly will the claimed low reset current density be observed.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Do annular electrodes present a scalable PCM solution? - Part 2
resistion   5/20/2013 4:34:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Much greater than 10F^2.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Do annular electrodes present a scalable PCM solution? - Part 2
resistion   5/20/2013 4:28:33 AM
NO RATINGS
If you define F as size of the nanoparticle, this cell will be much greater than ^2.



Most Recent Comments
resistion
 
resistion
 
Evariste
 
resistion
 
resistion
 
resistion
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
balajis_snps
 
David Ashton
Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.