REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Router ASIC wars
rick merritt   9/24/2013 1:39:52 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems like Cisco may not be so far ahead of AlcaLu, Huawei etc. this time around. What do you think?

krisi
User Rank
Author
400 Gb/s
krisi   9/24/2013 5:09:52 PM
NO RATINGS
400 Gb/s aggregate throughput is hardly impressive...more powerful ASIC have been designed few years back

ajaycm
User Rank
Author
Re: 400 Gb/s
ajaycm   9/25/2013 5:15:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I think this is a big deal. They have designed in the TM, QM funcionality into what was traditionally the NPU (packet processor). Previously, interface asics would stamp packets with preanalysis headers and send them to iTM (ingress traffic mgr) and from there it went to the NPU and or replicator engine for multicast. The amount of real estate on board was huge and it seems like they have significantly reduced the board real estate. That would allow them to put multiple such packet processing "pipelines". Seems this is huge for integration.

Knowing Cisco asics, I would not doubt that the operations in TM/QM/PP are probably as complete as you can imagine. What would be interesting is understanding the the number of queues they support for their TMs and some other TM details.

The folks who find this underwhelming probably don't understand what is going on here. This is not Z80s and LAN Controllers!

krisi
User Rank
Author
Re: 400 Gb/s
krisi   9/25/2013 5:45:25 PM
NO RATINGS
thank you @ajaycm...I understand this ASIC does deep level packet processing, it is not a switch...still there are other packet processing ASICs out there, how is Cisco ASIC tsacking against them? Kris

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 400 Gb/s
rick merritt   9/25/2013 6:54:45 PM
NO RATINGS
@ajaycmj and lowinger42: Thanks for your perspective!

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Re: 400 Gb/s
rick merritt   9/26/2013 9:37:41 AM
NO RATINGS
I have asked Cisco to chime in with answersw to the questions below. Hopefully they will soon.

lowinger42
User Rank
Author
400 Gbps
lowinger42   9/25/2013 11:53:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Just comparing bandwidth is not telling us that much.

What can be done to each packet at 400 Gbps/300 Mpps? That is much more interesting to compare. Number of SRAM/DRAM/TCAM lookups, what type of QoS, number of queues, type and number of schedulers etc.

And the comment that 300 Mbpps it too low. I see very little reason to design for linerate 64 byte packets. That does not exist in the real word... It can be done but it will negatively affect what can be done for each packet... 

asdffgddgfsasdfasdf
User Rank
Rookie
Re: 400 Gbps
asdffgddgfsasdfasdf   5/23/2017 5:01:36 PM
NO RATINGS
with increasing large volume DDoS small pps full feature performance is getting essential. If a box can't do <200B linerate with production features, it is not really Internet ready.



Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.