REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DrQuine
User Rank
Author
Software / Hardware Challenge
DrQuine   12/9/2013 9:30:25 PM
NO RATINGS
The issues raised by this case are clearly keeping the lawyers busy. I'd like to pose a simpler question. If you invent a piece of hardware and get a patent on it, should I be able to implement the same invention in software and get around your patent?

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: Software / Hardware Challenge
betajet   12/9/2013 9:49:53 PM
NO RATINGS
If I invent a piece of hardware that does something physical, your software could not possibly do the same thing because software by itself does not have a physical manifestation -- it just does mathematics.  So as a non-lawyer, I cannot see how it can infringe since it does not actually do anything physical.  If you add hardware to your software so that it then does the physical thing my hardware does, it's no longer software-only and could then possibly infringe.

JMO/YMMV/IANAL

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
Re: Software / Hardware Challenge
DrQuine   12/9/2013 10:40:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm sure that other readers can think of better examples, but the one that comes to mind is the abacus. If you were the first person to invent the abacus, wouldn't a software abacus APP on a smart phone violate your invention even though it contained no beads, no metal rods, no wooden frame, no corner brackets, and no moving parts? It seems to me that as soon as many physical inventions are disclosed that the software implementation suddenly becomes "obvious".

betajet
User Rank
Author
Re: Software / Hardware Challenge
betajet   12/9/2013 11:14:48 PM
NO RATINGS
The abacus is an improved method of counting compared to moving stones (called calculi by the Romans :-) around on an unconstrained surface.  But there are many ways of constraining how stones move, and I bet people had already been using others (such as grooves and pits) long before the advent of metal-working permitted beads on wires.  An abacus simply automates a mathematical counting process already understood, and it's perfectly legal for others to automate that same mathematics using other physical hardware.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
Software patents
rick merritt   12/10/2013 1:40:04 AM
NO RATINGS
I'd love to hear experiences from people who have gotten or filed for software patents

Scott SG.
User Rank
Author
How about firmware?
Scott SG.   12/10/2013 11:57:21 AM
NO RATINGS
What I really want to know is if this case will have ramafications for Apple vs. Samsung or other recent high profile cases where, for instance, UI is executed within software / firmware.

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
Re: Software / Hardware Challenge
DrQuine   12/10/2013 8:43:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I appreciate that the abacus has prior art (counting units on fingers and tens on feet). My mind experiment was to ask a question about the migration of an insight regarding physical objects to a software representation. If the physical abacus were invented in an innovation vacuum with no prior art, I would think that another inventor's software representation would be infringing to the first inventor. Likewise, if there were no related prior art and I invented the iPhone abacus APP, I would consider a physical stone and wood model to infringe my software version.

AZskibum
User Rank
Author
Re: Software / Hardware Challenge
AZskibum   12/11/2013 12:04:52 AM
NO RATINGS
There are so many issues the courts have to wrestle with on this one. What is software, as an entity independent of it's incarnation on a processor that can execute it? Is it the ones & zeros stored in flash or on a disk? Is it the source code? If so, then does it not bear more resemblance to a written work that could be copyrighted -- like a book -- but not necessarily patented?

zewde yeraswork
User Rank
Author
Re: Software / Hardware Challenge
zewde yeraswork   12/11/2013 9:44:56 AM
NO RATINGS
I think that's an important question. The line between software and hardware is murkier than we often let on and its possible that some of these issues will spill over into hardware from the world of software where they currently animate courtroom arguments.

betajet
User Rank
Author
Die Gedanken sind frei
betajet   12/11/2013 1:32:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Here's my opinion (IANAL).  Anything you can in principle do purely in your head -- or in your head supplemented by pencil and paper -- must not be patentable.  All software is in this category.  Otherwise the government is restricting what you can think, something anathema to a freedom-loving country.  The courts recognize this by making mathematics non-patentable.  They haven't figured out yet that software is mathematics.

Are you saying your abacus App -- which costs nothing to replicate -- cannot compete with a physical product that has manufacturing and distribution costs unless you have a monopoly from the USA government?  :-)

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.