REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
_hm
User Rank
Author
1.5M only?
_hm   3/5/2014 6:42:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Touchstone has good product portfolio. Why they got only 1.5M? Did thay got some other compensation in silicon lab.

Dave1010101
User Rank
Author
Re: 1.5M only?
Dave1010101   3/12/2014 2:42:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Touchstone tried to do to Maxim what Maxim did to others decades ago. I was always a bit worried the Touchstone strategy would rile the lawyers of one of the suppliers they were trying to one-up, specifically Maxim. No news on that angle has surfaced to date.

Since there was no mention of Toushstone management joining the firm that sort of throws up a red flag. The reporters need it dig a bit into this.

I suppose I could drive buy the Touschstone parking lot and see if there are any cars there!

 

 

truekop
User Rank
Author
touchstone stumbling
truekop   3/5/2014 9:44:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Analog on CMOS, could that have failed touchstone...just speculating could the absence of access to a solid linear BiCMOS /BCDMOS process spanning a good voltage range limit the product portfolio of touchstone, while the analog players like TI and ADI have good exposure these type of process technologies....whatever said and done foundry not equal to an internal fab with respect to linear analog process technologies....

analog marketer
User Rank
Author
Settling
analog marketer   3/7/2014 1:03:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Just based on development costs alone for these products, $1.5M would have been a bargain for many companies.  I wonder if the seller looked for any competitive bids before settling.

Howman
User Rank
Author
Energy harvesting portfolio
Howman   3/10/2014 7:36:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Touchstone has some compelling technology applicable to the energy harvesting space so this seems like a great fit for Silicon Labs. Touchstone had the only low-power comparator with built-in Vref that operated below 1V that I could find at the time (and probably still does).  Ironically, my application was a load switch that kept an Energy Micro MCU disconnected from a supercap until enough charge was harvested to power-up and run the application. The load switch was necessary because the power draw from the MCU as the voltage approached the minimum operating voltage from below increased quite significantly until the MCU "came alive" at which point the power dropped greatly.  Without the load switch, the power level from the harvester was unnecessarily high just "to get over the hump".

I hope that since Silicon Labs now owns both the problem and a possible solution, they will address this MCU loading issue better in the future.



Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
Tim R Johnson
 
ewertz
 
antedeluvian
 
ewertz
 
perl_geek
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
perl_geek
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Most Recent Messages
11/19/2017
3:31:42 PM
Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.