REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
AZskibum
User Rank
Author
Re: Intel leading
AZskibum   3/27/2014 4:34:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Nice to hear that reports of the demise of Moore's Law are greatly exaggerated.

Susan Rambo
User Rank
Author
Re: "Intel CEO Bob Krzanich"
Susan Rambo   3/26/2014 3:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks @horta1212, we corrected the error, which we regret we had not caught in  proofreading process.  Thanks.

horta1212
User Rank
Author
"Intel CEO Bob Krzanich"
horta1212   3/26/2014 2:27:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Just a heads up. Intel doesn't have a CEO named Bob. It's Brian.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Krzanich

resistion
User Rank
Author
What does it prove
resistion   3/25/2014 10:27:30 PM
NO RATINGS
The demo only proves that Intel has a 14 nm process ready. It does not yet convince this process does not suffer significantly from the highlighted cost of increased amount of double patterning. We need the disclosure of how many layers require double patterning for example. It is likely more than for 22 nm. If not much more, then maybe it can be said to be advantageous for Intel.

_hm
User Rank
Author
Re: Any news from bigger chips?
_hm   3/25/2014 7:00:27 PM
NO RATINGS
@AKHO: Yes, that is correct. It will be nice to see real large scale product in commercial market. This will test the yield and other hidden cost. But Intel should soon bring out some good product.

 

AKH0
User Rank
Author
Any news from bigger chips?
AKH0   3/25/2014 5:03:21 PM
NO RATINGS
My understanding is that SerDes is a tiny <1mm2 circuit (A 4-channel, 28Gb/s at 28nm, was 3.34mm2, see LSI's paper at ISSCC'14). While this is a good demo, it does not say anything about yield and performance of microprocessor chips that are two orders of magnitude larger.

geekmaster
User Rank
Author
$10 billion to update fabrication facilities below 20nm?
geekmaster   3/25/2014 2:14:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I have not read the McKinsey report but according to this article: dropping below 20nm "requires updates in fabrication facilities that could cost more than $10 billion."  But Intel said once that about 80-90% of 20nm equipment is usable at the 14nm node.  Why is the cost in the McKinsey report so high?

 

 

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
Intel leading
wilber_xbox   3/25/2014 12:20:57 PM
Good to read that Intel is still pushing the boundaries for others to follow. The only concern is Intel's inability to break the ranks of the likes of ARM, Qualcomm etc in mobile and lower power devices. I think that the main reason behind all the problems is Intel's stubborness to share IP/platform with others. Intel must create an ecosystem for others to join and flourish.



Most Recent Comments
rick merritt
 
Tim R Johnson
 
ewertz
 
antedeluvian
 
ewertz
 
perl_geek
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
perl_geek
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Most Recent Messages
11/19/2017
3:31:42 PM
Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.