REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
rick merritt
User Rank
Author
More bridges
rick merritt   5/8/2014 4:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I know the fragmented state of IoT protocols and networks is a big issue. How much will UPnP+ help you? What gaps still need bridging?

y_sasaki
User Rank
Author
Re: More bridges
y_sasaki   5/8/2014 5:03:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think IoT problem is lack of standard, but TOO MANY of standard candidates. It haven't changed ever since no (or too many) "standard" IP discovery protocol. LDAP, SLP, SSDP(HTTP over UDP, used for UPnP), WSDP (another flavor of HTTP over UDP), LLMNR(Multicast DNS from Microsoft), Bonjour(another flavor of Multicast DNS from Apple), broadcast SNMP GET(Used by HP, many network printers are compatible) ... list just goes on. There would be more than a hundred of IP-based discovery protocols including propriatery ones. You can implement one, or some of them, but unfortunatelly, there's not a single standard protocol you can use universally.

Time will tell which one will survive and which one does not. I think several de-facto standards will be used for different applications, just like IP discovery protocol today (UPnP for routers, Bonjour for Apple-related products, SNMP GET for network printers, etc).

Alan Messer
User Rank
Author
Re: More bridges
Alan Messer   5/8/2014 7:36:31 PM
NO RATINGS
There are many protocols at the device level particularly for non-IP devices and only a small handful for IP connected devices. The challenge is bringing these together to match the users' expectation. This is where UPNP+ features come in: standard cloud access/discovery for 'anywhere access' and lightweight bridging to bring those other protocols into one ecosystem.

chanj0
User Rank
Author
Consolidation of Standards
chanj0   5/11/2014 4:32:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Internet, by nature, is a combined effort of a lot of standards and these standards, somehow, get the agreement of a lot of parties. IMHO, IETF has been the primary driving force and the standards are open. Nonetheless, for IoT development, a consortium formed by major makers will definitely help to further define IoT standard for one simple reason. IoT device is supposed to be low power consumption. If it has to supported a wide range of protocols, maintaining low power consumption will definitely become a challenge. In addition, security and privacy  will further complicate the development of IoT devices.



Like Us on Facebook
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Martin Rowe

Test Tool Finds Ethernet Wiring Errors
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
When my house was renovated several years ago, I had the electrician install network outlets in numerous places, then run the LAN cables to a wiring closet. But he didn't document the ends ...

Martin Rowe

Local Electronics Store Supplies Engineers and Hobbyists
Martin Rowe
5 comments
Rochester, N.Y. — Tucked away in this western New York city known for its optics is Goldcrest Electronics, a local store that's supplied businesses and individuals with electronic ...

Martin Rowe

How to Transform a Technology University (Book Review)
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
The Presiding Genius of the Place by Alison Chisolm. WPI, Worcester, Mass., 234 pp., 2016. Engineers love to discuss, and often criticize, engineering education. They often claim ...

Max Maxfield

Aloha from EEWeb
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Just a few minutes ago as I pen these words, I posted this blog about this month's Cartoon Punchline Competition over on EEWeb.com.