Advertisement
News
EEtimes
News the global electronics community can trust
eetimes.com
power electronics news
The trusted news source for power-conscious design engineers
powerelectronicsnews.com
ebn
Supply chain news for the electronics industry
ebnonline.com
elektroda
The can't-miss forum engineers and hobbyists
elektroda.pl
Products
Electronics Products
Product news that empowers design decisions
electronicproducts.com
Datasheets.com
Design engineer' search engine for electronic components
datasheets.com
eem
The electronic components resource for engineers and purchasers
eem.com
Design
embedded.com
The design site for hardware software, and firmware engineers
embedded.com
Elector Schematics
Where makers and hobbyists share projects
electroschematics.com
edn Network
The design site for electronics engineers and engineering managers
edn.com
electronic tutorials
The learning center for future and novice engineers
electronics-tutorials.ws
TechOnline
The educational resource for the global engineering community
techonline.com
Tools
eeweb.com
Where electronics engineers discover the latest toolsThe design site for hardware software, and firmware engineers
eeweb.com
Part Sim
Circuit simulation made easy
partsim.com
schematics.com
Brings you all the tools to tackle projects big and small - combining real-world components with online collaboration
schematics.com
PCB Web
Hardware design made easy
pcbweb.com
schematics.io
A free online environment where users can create, edit, and share electrical schematics, or convert between popular file formats like Eagle, Altium, and OrCAD.
schematics.io
Product Advisor
Find the IoT board you’ve been searching for using this interactive solution space to help you visualize the product selection process and showcase important trade-off decisions.
transim.com/iot
Transim Engage
Transform your product pages with embeddable schematic, simulation, and 3D content modules while providing interactive user experiences for your customers.
transim.com/Products/Engage
About
AspenCore
A worldwide innovation hub servicing component manufacturers and distributors with unique marketing solutions
aspencore.com
Silicon Expert
SiliconExpert provides engineers with the data and insight they need to remove risk from the supply chain.
siliconexpert.com
Transim
Transim powers many of the tools engineers use every day on manufacturers' websites and can develop solutions for any company.
transim.com

Solar Cells Made Obsolete

By   09.28.2015 0

PORTLAND, Ore.–Now before you get all excited by the headline, which is not click-bait according to the researchers, a new kind of nanoscale rectenna (half antenna and half rectifier) can convert solar and infrared into electricity, plus be tuned to nearly any other frequency as a detector. The invention was made at Georgia Tech (Atlanta) and peer-reviewed in today’s issue of Nature Nanotechnology.

Right now efficiency is only one percent, but in the paper (DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.220) professor Baratunde Cola and colleagues at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech, Atlanta) convincingly argue that they can achieve 40 percent broad spectrum efficiency (double that of silicon and more even than multi-junction gallium arsenide) at a one-tenth of the cost of conventional solar cells (and with an upper limit of 90 percent efficiency for single wavelength conversion).

video: https://youtu.be/kMdYVLtBtoY

Professor Baratunde Cola explains and demonstrates how optical rectennas are going to change the world by making cheap solar-to-electricity converters out of carbon nanotubes whose end had been turned into a metal-insulators-metal tunnel diode.

(Source: Georgia Tech, used with permission)

Based on a theory put forth over 50-years ago the rectenna idea was before its time, but now technology has finally caught-up to the concept, which is well suited for mass production, according to Cola. It works by growing fields of carbon nanotubes vertically, the length of which roughly matches the wavelength of the energy source (one micron for solar), capping the carbon nanotubes with an insulating dielectric (aluminum oxide on the tethered end of the nanotube bundles), then growing a low-work function metal (calcium/aluminum) on the dielectric and voila–a rectenna with a two electron-volt potential that collects sunlight and converts it to direct current (DC).

“Our process uses three simple steps: grow a large array of nanotube bundles vertically; coat one end with dielectric; then deposit another layer of metal,” Cola told EE Times. “In effect we are using one end of the nanotube as a part of a super-fast metal-insulator-metal tunnel diode, making mass production potentially very inexpensive up to 10-times cheaper than crystalline silicon cells.”

The structure resembles a metal-insulator-metal capacitor of a few attofarads, but by reducing area of the capacitor “plate” (each nanotube bundle is just 10-to-20 microns in diameter), the high electrical field concentration at the end of the nanotube, and the low work function of the metal, makes the device behave like a peta-hertz tunnel diode excited by solar energy emitting electrons in femtosecond bursts.

For Cola’s proof of concept, his group grew multi-nanotube bundles of about 8-to-10 microns in diameter, which they then scaled up to thousands of side-by-side bundles measuring about an inch square which produced microwatts of output power from the sun.

For commercialization, billions or even trillions of carbon-nanotube bundles could be grown side-by-side, ramping up the power output into the megaWatt range, after optimization for higher efficiency.

“We still have a lot of work to do to lower contact resistance which will improve the impedance match between the antenna and diode, thus raising efficiency,” Cola told us.”Our proof-of-concept was tuned to the near-infrared. We used infrared-, solar- and green laser-light and got efficiencies of less than one percent, but what was key to our demo was we showed our computer model matched our experimental results, giving us the confidence that we can improve the efficiency up to 40 percent in just a few years.”

For the future, Cola’s group has a three tiered goal–first develop sensor applications that don’t require high efficiencies, second to get the efficiency to 20 percent for harvesting waste heat in the infrared spectrum, then start replacing standard solar cells with 40 percent efficient panels in the visible spectrum. The team is also seeking suitable flexible substrates for applications that require bending.

“Now we are at a point where engineers in industry, can reach out and give us more application conditions,” Cola told us. “One thing we can do that semiconductors can’t is operate at ultra-high temperatures–they never have to be cooled to work well. In fact, they work better at temperatures up to 400-to-500 degrees Celsius.”

Cola estimates that 10-to-20 research groups worldwide are working on retennas, but his is the only one to change the paradigm to make vertical instead of planar devices, which makes all the difference.

Other researchers contributing to the work included Asha Sharma, Virendra Singh and Thomas Bougher.

Funding was provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Space and Naval Warfare (SPAWAR) Systems Center and the Army Research Office (ARO).

— R. Colin Johnson, Advanced Technology Editor, EE Times Circle me on Google+

Related articles:

0 comments
Post Comment
Terry.Bollinger   2015-09-28 12:16:34

I just wanted to point out the list of research funding  agencies at the end of this excellent article: DARPA (Pentagon), SPAWAR (Navy), and ARO (Army). The incredible value to our long-term economy of federal and DoD funded university and small-business is often underappreciated in these days when bashing anything federal has become a byword for some folks. Yet the truth is that it's often the federal and DoD funding in basic research that often triggers some of the highest value innovation in the private sector, where (as planned!) those research investments get transferred over to private groups that have the skills to make them into real products with real impacts.

This technology is still early, but this well-planned strategy of one of our finest universities promises to deliver a truly world-changing approach to renewable energy in the long term. The implications of that simple cannot be underestimated, and it is the kind of result that comes from well-planned, judicious use of public and private partnerships that pay careful attention to where the true strengths reside on both sides of that partnership.

Steve Knapp   2015-09-28 12:42:08

Agreed. However, consider that the *ENTIRE* NASA FY2014 budget was $17.647 BILLION.

http://spaceflightnow.com/2014/12/14/nasa-gets-budget-hike-in-spending-bill-passed-by-congress/

Meanwhile, the government wasted $17.7 BILLION just in improper earned-income tax credits (EITC).

http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/tax-practice/improper-eitc-payments-totaled-177-billion-in-fy2014-74605-1.html

The U.S. can fund robust long-term strategic research just from the spare change lost in the couch from other government programs WITHOUT raising taxes.

R_Colin_Johnson   2015-09-28 12:46:39

Terry, I couldn't have said it better myself. Some of the world's greatest innovations--including the Internet itself--were funded by the feds, of which there are numerous grand-thinking contributors. This completely new type of solar harvester is a perfect example. If all goes as planned, the Chinese are going to be sorry they overbuilt all those plastic solar cell manufacturing plants!

R_Colin_Johnson   2015-09-28 12:50:47

Steve, yes you are right. In addition, it usually doesn't take billions or even millions to fund the most experimental, highest risk, highest payoff research.  All the researchers usually need is a few hundred thousand to prove the concept, then non-federal funding usually fills the gap to developing a manufacturable products.

matvp   2015-09-28 21:49:08

I'm perhaps too jaded but I've seen lots of "game changing" research with "5 year" horizons for commercialization come and go with nary a peep after the initial spurt of positive press. As with many other "breakthroughs" I hope I'm proven wrong on this one. But a cursory google search of 2010 solar related "breakthroughs" shows an amazing menagerie of technologies with promise. However the reality seems to be far off. Indeed we seem to have taken a step backwards. The most efficient panel in 2010 was a Sanyo panel at nearly 17.5% efficiency. Today it's a Kyocera panel at 16% efficiency seeing has how Sanyo was bought out and no longer sells the highly efficient panel. C'est la vie I suppose.

As for government funding being strictly a force for good, well, there's the good and the bad. Solyndra, Crescent Dunes, Cash for Clunkers, etc come to mind for the bad and that's all without trying. 

OldFort   2015-09-29 08:48:26

Bara is a heck of a researcher, so I am very hopeful that he will be able to follow through with this. I worked with him at Purdue when he was getting his Ph.D. and he was able to plow through a variety of roadblocks. This is one invention that I have a great deal of hope in.

 

Roy Smith   2015-09-30 17:21:37

As many have said - we see 'breakthroughs' on an almost daily basis and then never hear of them again.  Nevertheless, many of those 'breakthroughs' morph into something else before getting to market, so we don't necessarily recognise them.  This technology looks fascinating to me - partly because it has the potential to make a really practical solar energy converter, but mainly because I wonder if there is the possibility of applying it to nuclear reactors.  Could the intense gamma radiation be directly converted into electrical energy?  Could the neutrons be used to flouresce some material and then convert the light directly into electrical energy?  Anything that could convert the fission products directly into electrical energy rather than into steam which is then run through a turbine to create electricity would give us a very attractive source of power.

SteveHarris0   2015-10-01 16:49:30

This is exciting technology, I hope it truly can reach 40% efficiency. Heck even 30% would be fantastic if it is truly low cost to produce. I agree with the judicious use of federal funds for basic research, where the cost to get to a proof-of-concept stage is fairly low, it can be money well spent. HOWEVER (I'm climbing on my soapbox now) there is a certain toxic branch of science that has consumed, and continues to do so, a far larger piece of the grant money pie than is reasonable (billions per year), with virtually nothing except scary stories to show for it. It is trashing the reputation of federally funded research, if it is not contained soon it will ruin it for all researchers, and we will be worse off as a nation. The appropriate number is millions, not billions, per year for this branch. You probably know already which branch I am referring to. It is climate research. Please, for the sake of western civilization, help put an end to this gravy train of corruption and greed. If you need proof this is occuring, please start digging for yourself. Above all please don't ignore what is happening. Thanks for reading.  Steve Harris, BSEE '92

Andrzej11   2015-10-01 19:26:06

The title of this article is misleading. Given that the broadband rectenna efficiency limit is 44%, it would be quite difficult to reach 90% conversion efficiency using the sun, which is not monochromatic, as the power source. It would be quite amazing if they were able to reach even the 40% that they claim. I wonder if they intend to use spectral splitting to achieve this very ambitious goal?

Andrzej11   2015-10-01 19:27:45

"Today it's a Kyocera panel at 16% efficiency .... "

Contrary to the above, there actually has been a slow improvement in conversion efficiency. One of the best on the market at present is the SunPower panel at over 21% efficiency. See here, http://us.sunpower.com/sites/sunpower/files/media-library/data-sheets/ds-x21-series-335-345-residential-solar-panels-datasheet.pdf .

When SolarCity brings its plant in South Buffalo online next year, their panels will exhibit a conversion efficiency of at least 21%. With further design optimization they claim they will be at 24% conversion efficiency not too long after.

R_Colin_Johnson   2015-10-01 19:39:53

Yes, you are right. 90% or maybe even 99% of "breakthroughs" run into some kind of insurmountable hurdle, or are just bought up and killed by a competitor protecting his own turf. Unfortunately, there is no way to know ahead of time which will fail and which will change-the-world (for the better). That's why its great that government grants a willing to take chances, in order to sift through and find the winning needle in the haystack.

R_Colin_Johnson   2015-10-01 19:43:36

Many who know these researchers say that if it can be done, they will reach 40% and beyond, but of course not all research pans out as planned--and is sometimes bought up by competitors who intentionally kill the project--patents and all--just to protect their investments.

R_Colin_Johnson   2015-10-01 19:45:56

Yes, the existig solar cell makers will be doing everything they can to improve the efficiency of their panels, both to beat each other and to be a moving target to upstart technologies which sometimes take decades to perfect.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.